Bob Corker’s relationship with President Trump: It’s complicated

Senator Corker told reporters at a Monitor Breakfast that he has a ‘very warm relationship’ with the president, but questions his colleagues who aren’t conflicted over the Trump presidency. 

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor

Sen. Bob Corker is a bundle of conflicts and contradictions. Last fall, the chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee got into a Twitter war with President Trump. Senator Corker called the White House an “adult day care center.” Mr. Trump dubbed the Tennessee Republican “Liddle Bob Corker.”

By January, they had called a truce, and now they talk regularly. Indeed, there’s much to discuss: North Korea, Iran, Syria, Russia, the nomination of CIA chief Mike Pompeo for secretary of State. So, when I convened a Monitor Breakfast with Corker on April 18, reporters packed the room at the St. Regis.

But it was Corker’s views on the president himself that intrigued me most. The senator made clear that he and Trump are still getting on just fine.

“I have a very warm relationship with the president,” Corker said. “He’s very accessible – more accessible than any president probably in the history of the world. I mean, he’s on the phone and available from 6 to 11 in the morning and from 6:30 till late at night.”

But, no surprise, there’s a “but” – what Corker calls the “constant chaos,” sometimes born of late-night phone calls from “unconventional” advisers who can throw a wrench in just about anything. 

Bottom line, Corker is deeply conflicted about this president, and he questions colleagues who aren’t: “Any Republican senator who hasn’t been conflicted over this presidency is either comatose or is pretty useless in their blindness – and we’ve got some of both.”

Corker’s internal tug of war extends to his own Senate seat. He announced his retirement last fall, then had second thoughts, and then in February decided to retire at the end of the year after all.

Since then, he’s donated to the Republican seeking to replace him – the very conservative Rep. Marsha Blackburn – but that’s it. What’s the issue? The Democrat in the race, former Gov. Phil Bredesen, is an old friend, and Corker refuses to campaign against him. In fact, at our breakfast, Corker sang Mr. Bredesen’s praises over their years of bipartisan collaboration.

I first met Corker back in 2006, when I traveled to Tennessee to write about his spirited race for the Senate against Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr. – scion of a big African-American political family. Corker, a wealthy businessman who had served a term as mayor of Chattanooga, won by a narrow margin.

I remember watching Corker campaign in a park in Knoxville, and then interviewing him afterward. I thought he had kind eyes. He still does, after nearly 12 years in the Washington pressure cooker.

Back in 2006, I didn’t envision Corker as a future Foreign Relations chairman – or a potential vice president or secretary of State, as Trump had once considered. But Corker turned himself into a Washington fixture, including now five visits to the Monitor Breakfast.

My colleague Howard LaFranchi also attended Wednesday’s breakfast, and wrote about Corker’s comments on Mr. Pompeo. I wrote a piece on Corker’s decision to “buck GOP tribalism” in the Tennessee Senate race.

C-Span videotaped the entire breakfast, which can be viewed here.

On Thursday, April 26, our breakfast guest will be Kevin Hassett, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Feel free to suggest some questions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Bob Corker’s relationship with President Trump: It’s complicated
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today