Is McConnell 'out of bounds' to ask governors to defy EPA?

Senior White House official says Senator McConnell's plea to governors to refuse to submit compliance plans to the EPA on coal-fired power plants is 'way outside the bounds of the position that he was elected to.'

Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor
Jeff Zients (l.), director of the National Economic Council, and Brian Deese, senior advisor to President Obama, speak at the Monitor Breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel on March 20 in Washington.

A senior White House official responded strongly to the letter Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky sent Thursday to all state governors urging them to defy rules drafted by the Obama Administration to curb carbon pollution from coal fired power plants.

In his letter, Senator McConnell, who represents a major coal producing state, laid out a legal rationale for the governors to refuse to submit compliance plans to the Environmental Protection Agency. He argued that the use of the Clean Air Act to change power plant regulations was unconstitutional.

“Declining to go along with the administration’s legally dubious plan will give the other two branches of government time to address the proposal and will not put your state at risk in the interim,” the majority leader wrote. “It will provide time for the courts to rule on whether the EPA’s proposed rule is legal, and it will give Congress a chance to address numerous concerns surrounding this latest power grab by the EPA.”

Brian Deese, a senior adviser to President Obama whose portfolio includes climate conservation and energy policy, fired back at McConnell’s effort during a Monitor-hosted breakfast for reporters on Friday. 

“What you have is a Republican leader in Mitch McConnell who is going way outside the bounds of the position that he was elected to,” Mr. Deese said. “We all would be better served if he and others spent less time trying to lecture states about what they should be doing ... and more time actually trying to get some constructive things done in Congress, like for example, we could confirm a highly qualified attorney general nominee who has been sitting out there for more than 130 days.”

The power plant emission rules are just once part of a regulatory push to reduce greenhouse gas emissions which Deese called “a very aggressive agenda.” On Thursday the president signed an executive order to cut the federal government’s emissions of the heat trapping gases that cause global warming by 40 percent over 2008 levels in the next decade. On Friday, the administration announced proposed rules regulating the use of hydraulic fracturing to recover oil and gas on federal lands. Fracking is a process in which water, chemicals, and sand are injected underground to free oil or gas from rock.

In the final quarter of Mr. Obama’s time in office, there will continue to be a focus on items he can implement by executive action without needing to wait for Congress. Dealing with stagnating middle class wages will be a key priority, said Jeffrey Zients, director of the National Economic Council, who also spoke at Friday’s breakfast.

“We will continue to execute on the executive actions we have already rolled out and do new executive actions,” Mr. Zients said. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.