Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa sees "draconian" cuts ahead in Obama's budget

Although the nation needs investment in infrastructure and education, among other areas, US Conference of Mayors President Antonio Villaraigosa says Congress' past bad behavior mean President Obama's budget will likely have serious spending cuts.

Michael Bonfigli / The Christian Science Monitor.
US Conference of Mayors President Antonio Villaraigosa of Los Angeles at the Hay Adams Hotel in Washington DC on Jan. 18, 2012.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (D) is currently president of the US Conference of Mayors. He previously served as speaker of the California Assembly. He was the guest speaker at the Jan. 18 Monitor breakfast in Washington.

The economic outlook for American cities:

"There is a great deal of economic malaise throughout the country.... It will take about five years for many of our cities to regain the jobs that were lost before this recession."

Predictions that President Obama's 2013 budget will include cuts that hit cities:

"Anybody who saw the [debt ceiling] deal last summer and then the failure of the super committee to do anything to resolve this stalemate ... knew that there were going to be serious and draconian cuts."

The nation's infrastructure needs:

"When you look at America over the last 25 years, the lack of investment in infrastructure is startling – whether it is bridges, whether it is ports or airports, whether it is highways ... whether it is high-speed rail. We've got to catch up."

Tax policy in an election year:

"[Mitt] Romney's effective tax rate ... in the neighborhood of 15 percent ... is going to generate a great deal of debate.... The corporate tax rate is too high.... The capital-gains rate is too low. There should be a middle ground here to spur investments."

Prospects for immigration reform legislation:

"The prospects of doing anything in this Congress are small. That doesn't mean we can't keep on knocking on the door and demanding that these people [in Congress] do their job. The immigration system is broken."

The California dream:

"The California dream has lost some luster. We are not making the investments in our state that we did."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.