Romney's Pennsylvania chase: State's Republicans trying hard to believe

Pennsylvania Republicans hope against hope that Mitt Romney, who made a late play for their state, can pull off an upset win there. But they acknowledge it's hard to get the math to add up.

Brian Snyder/REUTERS
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney greets workers at a campaign call center during the US presidential election in Green Tree, Pennsylvania November 6, 2012.

Mitt Romney's eleventh-hour run at Pennsylvania, long thought to be in President Obama's column, has raised hopes among the state's rank-and-file Republicans that their state could, for the first time since 1988, vote to put a Republican in the Oval Office.

It's what their hearts are longing for, but what their minds are struggling to believe could come to pass.

With polls in the Keystone State closing at 8 p.m., Republicans there know the state has more than 1 million more Democratic voters than GOP voters – and an unremarkable day of voting thus far challenges their ability to make the electoral math go their way.

“My brain tells me the math doesn’t add up,” says Charlie Gerow, a Republican strategist with more than 30 years of experience in the state. “But my gut tells me that [Mr. Romney will win].”

Speaking for conservatives' hearts are people like Ana Puig, a Pennsylvania field coordinator for the fiscally conservative group FreedomWorks. Ms. Puig, reached by phone, is working the polls in Bucks County, Pa., perhaps the premier “collar county” of Philadelphia that state experts believe could help swing the election into Romney’s camp.

“If this morning was an indication, we’re really good to go,” Puig says, noting that turnout isn’t booming but isn’t limping in, either. 

She’s been talking to voters all day and feels as if Republicans are doing well at the two precincts she’s visited.

Mr. Gerow emphasizes that Romney could very well win Pennsylvania – the Real Clear Politics average of recent polls shows Mr. Obama with roughly a four percentage point lead.

Yet “the math, really, wasn’t always there because [Romney] didn’t start early enough here,” Gerow says. “You had to overcome a marathon run [by the Obama campaign] with a five-day sprint. That’s tough to do.”

Democrats have long been skeptical of Romney's prowess in the state.

"If it was out of reach a week ago, nothing in that period would cause things to be appreciably different" on Election Day, says T.J. Rooney, former head of the state's Democratic Party, in a phone interview.

Intellectual skepticism isn’t the rule among the Pennsylvania GOP by any stretch.

Chris Nicholas, a veteran GOP strategist in the state, says he believes Romney has a 60 percent chance to take Pennsylvania.

“Obama hasn’t had enough time to really go after [Romney] here,” Mr. Nicholas says. “I think the turnout matrix is favoring the Republicans. That’s what I felt when the day started. We’ll see if unfolding events support that.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Romney's Pennsylvania chase: State's Republicans trying hard to believe
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today