A weekly window on the American political scene hosted by the Monitor's politics editors.

What Robert Mueller said about Trump, and didn't say

Carolyn Kaster/AP
Special counsel Robert Mueller speaks at the Department of Justice May 29 in Washington about the Russia investigation.

Dear Reader:

Read the report.

That’s essentially what Robert Mueller said in his press conference today. The special counsel, who announced he was officially resigning, read a 10-minute statement in which he made clear that he did not want to testify before Congress – and that if he is called to do so, his testimony would not “go beyond” his written report.

Why We Wrote This

Obstruction of justice? Robert Mueller says that the U.S. Justice Department cannot legally charge any sitting president for a crime.

Mr. Mueller did take the opportunity to reiterate some of his report’s key findings:

  • That Russia, as alleged in a grand jury indictment, made “multiple, systemic efforts” to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election – a “concerted attack on our political system,” he said, that “deserves the attention of every American.”
  • That his team found “insufficient evidence” to charge the Trump campaign with conspiring with Russia to influence the election.
  • And that, when it came to obstruction of justice, his team “did not make a determination,” being bound by Justice Department guidelines that prevent a sitting president from being charged with a crime. “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime,” he said, “we would have said so.”

Perhaps most notably, Mr. Mueller stated, “The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” That seems certain to further ramp up calls on the left for impeachment.

Still, all of this – as Mr. Mueller noted – was in the original report.

 And there’s the rub. Because the Mueller report, which was supposed to provide clarity on a topic of vital national interest, has instead only seemed to muddy the waters. Some people read it as clear vindication for President Donald Trump. Others see it as a damning portrayal that makes a rock-solid case for impeachment.

“It seems to me that Mueller’s office thinks that their report is clearer than we do,” NBC’s Julia Ainsley said, somewhat exasperatedly, on air today.

 “It’s like the white and gold dress,” a media colleague remarked to me over the weekend – referring to that viral image that sparked furious online debates a few years back.

 Today, all Mr. Mueller made clear is that when it comes to interpreting what he wrote – is it white and gold? Or blue and black? – he’s not going to help us out.

 Let us know what you’re thinking at csmpolitics@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.