How 'cray-cray' made the Oxford Dictionary

Politics is getting more hyperbolic, more insult-driven, and more eager to gobble up terms from pop culture.

Susan Walsh/AP
President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference following the G-20 Summit in Antalya, Turkey, on Monday. At a recent fundraiser, the president used the term 'cray' to dismiss the claims of climate deniers.

“Cray-cray.” An extreme level of crazy behavior.

Politics is getting more hyperbolic, more insult-driven, and more eager to gobble up terms from pop culture. “Cray-cray” has been around for a while to describe derangement – its first appearance in the Online Slang Dictionary came in 2001 – but it appears to have become more prevalent in the news over the past year.

The Washington Times’s Charles Hurt concluded that President Obama was “truly cray-cray” last November when the president issued an executive order on immigration that was deeply loathed in conservative circles. Then, before he left The Daily Show, Jon Stewart in April criticized conservative Supreme Court justices’ “anti-gay cray-cray” opposition to same-sex marriage. USA Today’s Eileen Rivers said in a preview of the August Republican presidential debate: “Even Donald Trump supporters should have an easy enough time pointing out the GOP candidate’s potential for bringing the cray-cray to tonight's debate.”

But it drew a whole new level of attention when Obama, appearing at a fundraiser, jokingly dismissed climate-change deniers as “cray.” And after last weekend’s Democratic debate, Politico’s Glenn Thrush summarized Hillary Clinton’s oft-criticized statement about her Wall Street contributions and the 9/11 attacks by concluding: “Hillary said something really cray-cray.”

Such is the power of “cray” that the Oxford Dictionary officially added it – along with “clickbait,” “YOLO” and other popular terms – to its lexicon last year. At the same time, Lake Superior State University has included it in its annual list of words that should be banished.

It popped up this month during country music’s CMA Awards, when superstars Brad Paisley and Carrie Underwood slipped in “cray-cray” during a current-events parody. Rolling Stone called the term “dated.”

Chuck McCutcheon writes his "Speaking Politics" blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.