How Mike Simpson's triumph for wilderness was a triumph for Congress

After 15 years of working on legislation to protect the Boulder-White Cloud Mountain range with a wilderness designation, Rep. Mike Simpson leveraged all his relationships and know-how to get a bill to the president's desk.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
Rep. Mike Simpson (R) of Idaho (3rd from l.) shakes hands with Sawtooth Society Executive Director Gary O'Malley (l.) after President Obama (seated) signed the Sawtooth National Recreation Area and Jerry Peak Wilderness Additions Act into law at his desk in the Oval Office at the White House on Aug. 7, 2015. Also pictured are guest observers Idaho Conservation League Executive Director Rick Johnson (2nd from l.), The Wilderness Society Idaho Regional Director Craig Gehrke (3rd from r.), Pew Charitable Trusts America's Wilderness Project Director Marcia Argust (2nd from r.) and US Department of Agriculture Under Secretary Robert Bonnie (r.).

Regular Order is a blog within a blog:  Each month, I will feature a member of Congress who has used his position to achieve good things for his constituents. Too often, the American people vote for folks based on a mistaken assumption of what that representative can do within the confines of his or her job. They can't achieve world peace or alone find a cure for cancer. But they can use their position to help their constituents or at least make certain that their concerns are being heard. Here is the first in the series.  

For the last 2 years, Lindsay Slater would wake up at 4:30 in the morning with the Antiquities Act at the top of his mind.

Teddy Roosevelt signed into law the Antiquities Act in 1906. Meant initially to preserve American Indians' ruins and artifacts, this legislation has been used more than a hundred times by presidents of both political parties to protect “objects of historic and scientific interest.”
The areas to be protected by the president, under the Antiquities Act, are declared “National Monuments” and, theoretically, they are supposed to be confined to the smallest area possible compatible with the proper care of objects of concern.
Slater is the chief of staff to Congressman Mike Simpson, the Republican who represents the Second District of Idaho. Simpson hired Slater because of his expertise in land management issues in the Northwest. Lindsay had previously worked for US Rep. Greg Walden (R) of Oregon, and successfully worked to get a portion of his district declared a wilderness area.
As the nascent environmental movement gained steam, President Lyndon Johnson signed the Wilderness Act of 1964. The purpose was to protect, through law, those areas defined as a wilderness:

“A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.”

Unlike a monument declaration, a wilderness designation requires congressional approval. A monument declared by a president can be undeclared by a future president, but a wilderness designation is permanent law. Wilderness areas tend to be more proscriptive about what kind of activity can happen in them. For example, bike riding is [usually] not allowed in a wilderness area, which tends to irritate mountain bikers.
For 15 years, Mike Simpson had been trying to protect the Boulder-White Cloud Mountain range with a wilderness designation. The Boulder White Clouds region is the largest unprotected region remaining in the lower 48 states, a roadless region of towering peaks, alpine lakes, and primeval forests. The beauty of the region is also an economic engine, drawing in tourists, hunters, campers and anglers from around the globe.
Simpson hired Slater because they shared a common love of the outdoors and a common appreciation for a balanced approach to economic growth and environmental protection.
The two make a good team. Simpson is gregarious and fills up the room with his big personality. Slater is methodical, organized, with a gentility that masks an iron spine.
For the last decade and a half, they would take trips to the district, backpacking with the Forest Service, gaining an appreciation for the land, its beauty and bounty, and its fragility. As Republicans, they also had a keen appreciation for the over-reach that often accompanied government bureaucracy and an over-zealous NGO community.
Simpson and Slater spent countless hours, meeting with constituents, listening to concerns from both sides, and trying to come up with equitable solutions. He had introduced legislation in both 2006 and 2010 to declare the region a wilderness area, only to have it bottled up in either the House or the Senate.
What would wake Slater up at 4:30 in the morning was not the failed attempts to pass legislation, but the possibility of executive action by President Obama.
When Mr. Obama gained the White House in the election of 2008, he didn’t spend any time campaigning in Idaho. The last Democrat to win the Keystone State, ironically, was Lyndon Johnson (the man who signed the Wilderness bill, it should be noted), and while Mr. Obama did better there than anybody could expect, he still lost the state by 23 percent.
That didn’t necessarily mean that he would ignore the state entirely. A key part of the Obama coalition was the environmental community, led by the Sierra Club, and they were pushing hard on the new president to designate as much of America as possible for monument status. Top on the list was the Boulder White-Cloud region.
And to Simpson and Slater, the possibility of presidential action was both a threat and an opportunity.
Here is how the Idaho Statesmen put it:

Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson and Idaho Conservation League Director Rick Johnson were sitting in The Mayflower Hotel’s dining room in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 14, 2014, before the rest of the guests filed in for a gala celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Wilderness Act. President Barack Obama’s point man on his national monument campaign, John Podesta, was led to Simpson’s table. “I hear you want to talk about BWC,” Podesta said, chuckling. Simpson, a conservative Republican, had just won a landslide victory in a high-stakes primary campaign against a tea party candidate funded by the Club for Growth. He had spent the last 15 years working to try to protect the iconic Boulder-White Clouds and came to the gala as Johnson’s guest.

Simpson told Podesta that he planned to make another run at his bill to protect the area as wilderness and that he wanted Obama to give him six months in 2015 to get it passed.

“He told me to go for it,” Simpson said.

Even though Obama administration officials had been privately telling conservationists, local officials and even motorized recreation advocates that they were working on a Boulder-White Clouds national monument, many people were skeptical. But when Idaho Sen. Jim Risch abruptly killed Simpson’s wilderness bill in 2010 after introducing it in the Senate, former Interior Secretary and Idaho Gov. Cecil Andrus — who convinced President Jimmy Carter to proclaim millions of acres of Alaska as national monuments in 1978 — wrote Obama and called on him to use the Antiquities Act of 1906 to force action for the Boulder-White Clouds. When it became clear in 2013 that Simpson’s bill still had no chance, Johnson and other conservation partners such as Craig Gehrke, Idaho representative of The Wilderness Society, shifted their campaign to Andrus’s national monument proposal. By September 2014, they had built a huge coalition of outdoor businesses, recreation groups, hunters, anglers and local governments, including Ketchum and Blaine County, pushing for the monument.
Still, Simpson told Podesta that many in Idaho didn’t think the administration was serious. “The threat is real,” Podesta replied.
Simpson and his constituents preferred a congressionally-approved wilderness designation to the president’s executive action for several reasons.

  1. First, the footprint for the wilderness designation would be much smaller than the Monument declaration.
  2. Second, the Congressional route had deeper roots and was more meaningful statutorily.
  3. Third, the Simpson bill had much more input from the region than a presidential declaration. Simpson had long represented the region and knew intimately all of the characters and all of their concerns, which were reflected in his legislation. Obama had visited the state once as president, and while primary voters did give him a boost in Idaho in 2008, he wasn’t counting on their votes or their support for anything. He was answering not to the people of Idaho, but to the environmentalist community.

Simpson had a close personal relationship with House Speaker John Boehner, and he leaned on his friend to get his Wilderness bill through the House.
Simpson also had a good relationship with Sen. Mitch McConnell. Both faced similar energetic and failing primary challenges in 2014, funded by the same outside groups and mounted by the same public relations firm. Both Simpson and McConnell easily dispatched their primary foes and were now in a position to do their jobs as legislators.
Simpson wasn’t taking any chances, though, and he was able to get Boehner to go to McConnell to get the new majority leader on board.
Simpson also skillfully used the threat of the presidential executive action to get his own delegation on board. Sen. Jim Risch, who as noted, previously had pulled his support for the Simpson approach, now aggressively moved to support his colleague.
Risch, who was once hailed by National Journal as the most conservative member of the Senate, was able to convince other conservatives, like Ted Cruz, that the Simpson Wilderness bill was far better than giving the president the excuse to declare more of Idaho out of bounds for economic exploitation.
Ultimately, the House passed the bill, the Senate similarly approved it and the president signed it.
Most Americans probably don’t know a thing about the Antiquities Act nor will they have the chance to visit the White Cloud Mountain range. Nor have they heard of Mike Simpson or even know that he has a staff member named Lindsay Slater.
But this is how the Congress works to represent the interests of the American people.
We might not all agree on whether mountain bikers should have the right to ride their bikes and destroy wilderness areas. We might not all agree that some areas in this country are worth protecting for future generations, that areas that are so beautiful that they literally take your breath away don’t need to be protecting from mining interests.
But one congressman believed that to be the case, and he used all of his relationships and all of his know-how to reach common ground with his constituents, his colleagues and with the president, to hammer out a solution that will preserve a unique spot in America for the foreseeable future.
This is how Congress is supposed to work. This is how our democracy is supposed to function.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How Mike Simpson's triumph for wilderness was a triumph for Congress
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today