'Probe with bayonets': Why so many politicos are cribbing from Lenin

Richard Nixon popularized the term 'probe with bayonets – If you encounter mush, proceed; if you encounter steel, withdraw.' But others are picking it up. 

Lance Iversen/AP
Republican presidential candidate, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, speaks at the Inaugural Basque Fry at Corley Ranch in Gardnerville, Nev., on Aug. 15.

“Probe with bayonets” A maxim attributed to Lenin that is used in politics to describe a method for dealing tactically with opponents.

Former President Richard Nixon appears to have brought the phrase into popular political use. He wrote in his 1978 autobiography “RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon”: “Communist leaders believe in Lenin’s precept: Probe with bayonets. If you encounter mush, proceed; if you encounter steel, withdraw.”

The idea is that a bayonet stuck in the soil can detect a land mine without setting it off; it’s designed to detonate under heavier pressure. The 1970 cult-classic war comedy “Kelly’s Heroes” features a scene in which Clint Eastwood, Don Rickles, and the rest of their platoon undertake just such a task after one of their buddies steps on a mine and is killed. (When Rickles’s character, Crapgame, encounters a buried explosive and is asked what kind it is, he retorts: “The kind that blow up! How the hell do I know what kind it is?”)

Prominent antitax activist Grover Norquist became known for employing a variation of “probe with bayonets,” though he denied it was an endorsement of Lenin’s tactics and definitely not of communism itself. Other Republicans have quoted it as a way of placing current Russian President Vladimir Putin in an established communist tradition of constantly searching for opponents’ vulnerabilities. The most recent has been Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has invoked it repeatedly.

“You know, Putin believes in the old Lenin adage that you probe with bayonets, when you find mush you push, when you find steel you stop,” Walker said at this month’s GOP debate. “Under Obama and Clinton, we found a lot of mush, over the last few years. We need to have a national security that puts steel in front of our enemies. I would send weapons to Ukraine. I would work with NATO to put forces on the eastern border of Poland and the Baltic nations, and I would reinstate ... the missile defense system that we had in Poland and in the Czech Republic.”

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R) of Texas, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, also used the expression to refer to Putin in a June speech. “It seems that Mr. Putin and those around him don’t see economic sanctions and [U.S. military] training exercises as steel,” Thornberry said.

But Democratic strategist Paul Begala, about as far from a conservative as you can get, also brought up the expression in a 2003 article about how his party had come to be perceived as weak, especially when compared to GOP President George W. Bush and his then-highly regarded political mastermind Karl Rove.

“The adjective that comes to mind is ‘toothless,’’’ Begala said of Democrats. “What we need is some attitude. Karl is an old friend. I love Karl and admire his toughness. When someone takes shots at Bush, he hits back with greater force. Which means you can’t run and hide. You have to answer these people with steel. Probe them with bayonets, look for weaknesses, then stick ‘em in.”

Chuck McCutcheon and David Mark write their "Speaking Politics" blog exclusively for Politics Voices.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.