Trump says Cruz dad knew Lee Harvey Oswald. Trouble for GOP?

Donald Trump's latest barb aimed at Ted Cruz is based on a National Enquirer report and might be a case of mistaken identity. 

Michael Conroy/AP
Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz speaks during a rally at the Indiana State Fairgrounds in Indianapolis Monday.

Donald Trump on Tuesday implied that Ted Cruz’s father was an associate of Lee Harvey Oswald, John F. Kennedy’s assassin.

“His father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald’s being – you know, shot,” said Trump during a phone interview with Fox News

Though he did not say so, Mr. Trump was probably drawing on a recent story in the tabloid National Enquirer, which made the same charge. While the Enquirer has been correct on explosive political stories in the past – they were right about John Edwards and his extramarital affair – the sourcing on the Cruz/Oswald story is incredibly thin. It consists largely of alleged photo experts saying that a man in an old, blurry photo of Oswald looks like Rafael Cruz, Ted Cruz’s Cuban-born dad.

Come on, really? “This is another garbage story in a tabloid full of garbage,” said Cruz communications director Alice Stewart

Perhaps the Enquirer has its Cruzes mixed up. The photo in question is of Oswald passing out pro-Castro leaflets in New Orleans in 1963. According to author Gerald Posner’s definitive JFK conspiracy debunking book, “Case Closed,” a man named Miguel Cruz was among a group of anti-Castro Cubans who confronted Oswald while he was distributing this literature. They got into a brawl and some were arrested.

That Cruz was not related to Ted Cruz’s family.

The problem for the Republican Party is that other GOP candidates are going to get asked about Trump’s loose charges, such as this one, going forward. It’s easy to imagine reporters asking Republican Senate candidates whether they agree with the latest thing Trump said today, no matter how outrageous. Particularly if it’s outrageous, actually.

Democratic opponents will do their best to make Republicans appear supportive of whatever the heck it is Trump says. To see how that might work, look at this web ad for Connor Eldridge, a Democrat who’s running against incumbent GOP Sen. John Boozman in Arkansas. It’s brutal.

Trump’s risen as far as he has in part because of his ability to thrill supporters on the stump. His short, punchy language and penchant to say anything makes them feel like he’s fighting back against a “politically correct” and corrupt political culture. He shows no signs of dialing it back if, as likely, he’s the GOP nominee. It’ll be pretty interesting to see how that style plays in a general election.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.