GOP debate: Five things that won't happen, but should

Stories after debates often focus on events no one predicted in advance, such as Carly Fiorina ripping Donald Trump for talking about her looks. So here's our take on 5 things that should happen Tuesday night, but probably won't.

Morry Gash/AP/File
Republican presidential candidate, from left, Sen. Marco Rubio, (R) of Florida, Donald Trump, Ben Carson and Sen. Ted Cruz, (R) of Texas, wait before the Republican presidential debate at the Milwaukee Theatre on Nov 10. The leading Republican candidates for president are meeting for their first debate in more than a month Tuesday in the shadow of terrorist attacks that refocused the race on keeping the country safe.

It seems as if every pundit in America does a “Five Things to Watch For” story before Republican and Democratic presidential debates. Do those things actually happen? Sometimes. But sometimes not – stories after the debates often focus on unpredicted events, such as Carly Fiorina ripping Donald Trump for talking about her looks, or Bernie Sanders saying he’s tired of hearing about Hillary Clinton’s e-mails.

So we’re trying to subvert the genre. For Tuesday night’s GOP debate in Las Vegas here’s our take on Five Things That Should Happen But Probably Won’t. You don’t have to watch for them, so that pressure is off. Whew! Maybe they’ll give some context to what does happen, though. That’s our hope.

Donald Trump asks Ted Cruz about his tax plan. Yes, The Donald is widely expected to go after the senator from Texas, who’s creeping up behind him in Iowa polls. If that happens the slams are likely to be short, and personal. That’s Mr. Trump’s style. He’s already labeled Senator Cruz a “maniac” for his relations with fellow senators.

What we’d like to see instead is businessman Trump asking Cruz about his (Cruz’s) tax plan. Economists have noted that this plan eliminates business income taxes, but includes a version of a value-added tax, which hits products at many steps on their road to consumers. They’re widely used in Europe but companies aren’t fond of them. Does Trump think a US VAT a yuuuge mistake?

Lindsey Graham rushes the stage. Senator Graham is not invited to the main GOP debate. He’s relegated to the kiddie table debate, along with Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, and George Pataki. But he’s been both funny and substantive in past undercards. And at a recent appearance at the Republican Jewish Coalition, Graham delivered something of a primal scream of the GOP establishment, hitting out at Trump’s tough rhetoric about undocumented immigrants, among other things.

So maybe he should just stand up in the audience and rush the stage to try and grab the mike and denounce whatever policies he thinks are hurting the party. He’s got little to lose, given he’s polling at less than 1 percent. And it would get lots of coverage.

Jeb Bush and Rand Paul talk about dads. Both Mr. Bush and Senator Paul are dangerously close to falling into irrelevance in the 2016 GOP race. Both also began with heavy expectations: Jeb Bush for obvious familial reasons; and Rand Paul for being Ron Paul’s son, and the “most interesting man in politics,” per Time Magazine.

Before they fall into the undercard it would be really interesting to hear these two scions talk about the burdens and joys of being the sons of successful politicians. What did they learn from them? What aspects of their legacy have they tried to escape? For Bush, this could be a way of sidestepping the issue of brother George W.’s presidency. For Paul, it could be a way to be interesting again.

Chris Christie steals somebody's podium. New Jersey Governor Christie has languished for much of the campaign, but recently he’s showed signs of life, particularly in the key early voting state of New Hampshire. He won the coveted endorsement of the New Hampshire Union Leader, and he’s rising in state polls.

But he’s got to do something dramatic to get attention on the national stage and showcase his tough-guy image, which could play well at a time when terrorism has become a top voter concern. What better way than to just take somebody’s better-positioned podium during a commercial break, so he’s closer to the center and Donald Trump? He’ll be standing next to Jeb Bush, so there’s one target. Or he could cross over the stage and commandeer Ben Carson’s. That would put him in the top three.

Everybody thanks Wolf Blitzer. Usually the media is a target at Republican debates. Newt Gingrich ripped into moderators in 2012. Ted Cruz has done so this cycle. Come on – would it kill them, for once, to thank the mainstream media for providing them free exposure to voters? Most people thank hosts at parties, whether they had a good time or not. CNN veteran Blitzer is the anchor for Tuesday night’s debate. They could acknowledge his contributions on stage – then rip him afterward in the spin room, if they feel they must.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.