HuffPo puts Donald Trump news in 'entertainment.' Smart or a stunt?

The Huffington Post says Trump's campaign is 'a sideshow.' But readers won't notice whether the Trump story they’re looking at is labeled as entertainment – and they won’t care.

Dominick Reuter/Reuters
Businessman and Republican candidate for president Donald Trump greets supporters after speaking at a campaign event in Laconia, N.H., on Thursday.

The Huffington Post says it’s going to put stories about Donald Trump’s presidential run in its entertainment section, not its political one.

“Our reason is simple: Trump’s campaign is a sideshow,” write HuffPo’s Washington bureau chief Ryan Grim and editorial director Danny Shea in a note to readers. “We don’t take the bait.”

Is this a correct decision? Is it noble? Is it ... bizarre? DC reporters are chewing over these and related questions like they were gum on this summer Friday. That’s entirely predictable. The contretemps combines two of journalism’s favorite topics: Donald Trump, and itself.

Journalism professor Jay Rosen is on the thumbs-up side of this ledger. An acerbic and often astute critic of the journalist practices in the modern digital world, Rosen judges the HuffPo move “brilliant."

“Huff Post’s Trump decision is a move against automatic thinking and herd behavior in campaign coverage,” Rosen tweets.  " 'We think for ourselves,’ it says.”

On the thumbs-down side were critics who saw the move as dealing with advertising more than editorial. The HuffPo is pointing at itself as much as Trump, defining its brand as contrarian, in this view.

Washington Post media columnist Erik Wemple, another sharp voice, called it a “Trumpian stunt," and wondered aloud if all Palin family coverage would now be shuffled into the entertainment section, too.

What’s our hot take? Glad you asked!

WHO’LL NOTICE? Journalism today is disaggregated. Readers come to stories via Google, or their Facebook feed, or some non-home-page entry point. They often don’t even know which publication wrote the story they’re reading, much less what “vertical” it’s located in. They won’t notice the Trump story they’re looking at is labeled as entertainment, and they won’t care.

WILL SUBJECTS CHANGE? It’s the type of story, not its location, that’s important here. If you’re writing about Trump’s screeds against illegal immigration, that’s a political subject, by definition. Putting it in entertainment doesn’t change its substance.

However, if HuffPo starts writing about Trump’s clothes on the campaign trail, and who’s that women behind his left shoulder (wink, nudge), we’ll know they’re serious about covering him as mainly an entertainment star.

SO WHAT? All that said, good for HuffPo. Journalism is not a hushed private club, where you get thrown out for wearing shorts to lunch. They can do whatever they want with their coverage to make what they consider a valid point. Then we’ll all argue about it, loudly. That’s what Fridays are for.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.