Trump-Oprah 2016: A match made in reality-TV heaven?

Donald Trump, billionaire businessman, reality TV star, and now 2016 presidential candidate, says he wants Oprah Winfrey as his VP. 

(AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally, Tuesday, June 16, 2015, in Des Moines, Iowa.

In an announcement that left viewers speechless, Democrats snickering, and late night comedians giddy, Donald Trump confirmed Tuesday that he's running for president – and he wants Oprah Winfrey as his vice president.

The billionaire businessman and reality TV star sat down for an interview with George Stephanopoulos of ABC News, who noted that when Mr. Trump was considering running for the office in 1999, he told talk show host Larry King he'd consider Oprah as his running mate. 

“I like Oprah,” Trump told Stephanopoulos. “I think Oprah would be great. I’d love to have Oprah. I think we’d win easily, actually.”

It was the cherry on top of a hyperbolic, meandering, nearly hour-long speech, in which, The Christian Science Monitor's Linda Feldmann noted, Trump "tossed out grandiose campaign promises, bragged about his billions, and threw shade at Republicans and Democrats alike."

Of course, Trump's chances to win the nomination are about as good as Dan Quayle's are to win a spelling bee – which is why, when a reporter asked fellow nominee Jeb Bush to respond to a Trump attack about the Common Core, Bush (or should we say, Jeb!?) just laughed.

So why, after 30 years of "threatening to run for president," is Trump finally running?

For a celebrepreneur, running for president is a one-way ticket to more limelight. Of course, Trump's never been shy about how he thinks America ought to be run. And, he can afford it. 

Which brings us back to Oprah, who probably would add support to Trump's bid, thanks to her millions of fans around the world.

Will it happen?

Not a chance. Ms. Winfrey said in 1999 that she wasn't interested in the job, and there's no evidence that she's changed her mind. 

We suspect Oprah is better off running her OWN TV network and media empire from her luxuriously-appointed Montecito and Maui homes than acting as Trump's presidential accessory.

And while she is a surprising (speculative) choice, there have been stranger VPs (and VP nominees), a position John Adams once called "the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived." 

Like Sarah Palin, the forthright Alaska governor who, in interviews in the days after her selection as John McCain's 2008 running mate, gave new meaning to "outside-the-beltway."

Or Dan Quayle, George H.W. Bush's VP, whose gaffe-laden tenure made him a national punchline.

But the prize for the strangest – and most dangerous – VP goes to Aaron Burr. Thomas Jefferson's understudy was so upset with Alexander Hamilton for, among other things, orchestrating the support that ultimately made Jefferson president and Burr vice president that he challenged Hamilton to a duel and killed him.

In other words, Oprah probably knows that she can do better than the vice presidency.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Trump-Oprah 2016: A match made in reality-TV heaven?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today