John Podesta joins Clinton campaign: What that means for Hillary 2016

Hiring John Podesta sends a clear, unmistakable signal that Hillary Clinton is running for president in 2016. Podesta would likely serve as a strategist and troubleshooter for Clinton.

(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)
Counselor to the President John Podesta speaks in Washington, Nov. 19, 2014. He's been reportedly hired by Hillary Clinton.

The Clinton 2016 camp is growing.

John Podesta, a senior White House adviser for President Obama, will step down from his post next month to serve in a senior role in Hillary Clinton's likely 2016 presidential bid, the Wall Street Journal first reported Tuesday.

Mr. Podesta, who served as Chief of Staff in former President Bill Clinton's second term, would likely take on the role of a campaign manager, according to reports, sending signals about Clinton's nascent campaign.

In Democratic circles, Podesta is a heavyweight.

"Few figures in the Democratic Party constellation carry as much intellectual heft as Mr Podesta," concluded the UK's Independent.

After serving under Mr. Clinton, he founded the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington, DC. The Obama administration brought him on as a special counselor to the President about a year ago to help reinvigorate Mr. Obama's political fortunes.

Podesta has counseled Obama in both foreign and domestic policy, advising him on matters including Ebola, immigration, and climate change. He was the surprise force behind negotiations with the Chinese government aimed at reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.

He is, as Politico once put it, "the quintessential Washington wise man."

Which is why Clinton is bringing him on her team.

And a Podesta hire sends clear signals.

For starters, if it weren't already obvious, it's another unmistakable sign that Clinton is running.

"The move is one of the most definitive signs yet that Mrs. Clinton is building the apparatus to launch a 2016 run," writes the Wall Street Journal.

It's also a sign that Clinton has learned from her mistakes from her 2008 bid, when a lack of staff unity and discipline cost her the nomination.

Podesta would likely serve as a strategist and troubleshooter for Clinton, working to "stave off the sort of internal staff feuding that erupted in Mrs. Clinton’s failed 2008 presidential bid," reports the Journal.

The Independent calls his likely role "enforcer of discipline...something that was famously missing during her tumultuous bid in 2008..."

And by calling on Podesta, Clinton is making it clear that's she's serious.

Podesta is the guy people call on when the going gets tough: He served as Bill Clinton's chief of staff from 1998 to 2001, helping control a series of crises including Clinton's impeachment trial. The Obama administration brought him on to help the President steer a path through Congressional impasses and to avert embarrassments like the Affordable Care Act's botched rollout.

When it comes to hiring, managing, and overseeing a staff, Podesta is known as a master.

"[H]e has given as much thought to the form and function of the White House staff as anyone in the Democratic Party. Probably more," writes Politico.

And as the architect of the liberal Center for American Progress, Podesta is both well-connected with other party intellectuals and well-versed in Democratic policy ideals, giving him "a deep reservoir of credibility within Democratic circles," adds Politico.

Of course, he's also a close friend and longtime political ally of the Clintons. In addition to serving as Bill Clinton's chief of staff, he has held a top role in the family's charitable foundation.

Bill Clinton, for one, has nothing but praise for Podesta.

As he once told the WSJ about his former chief of staff, “He’s very straight forward. He doesn’t play games with people. You always know where he stands."

And with her Podesta hire, Clinton is also making clear where she stands in 2016.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.