Michelle Obama cuts ad for Wendy Davis in Texas. A boost?

Michelle Obama is not campaigning in person for Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis. In the last weeks before the midterm elections, she’ll probably go in person only to where she might actually swing a race.

Morry Gash/AP
First lady Michelle Obama claps after speaking at a campaign event for Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2014, in Madison, Wis.

Michelle Obama has just cut an ad boosting Democratic Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis. The 60-second spot is upbeat and focuses on state Senator Davis’s upbringing – she’s the daughter of a single mom and was a mother herself at age 19 – and her support for education programs and various Democratic initiatives such as a proposed increase in the minimum wage.

“This is Michelle Obama, and I hope you will vote for Wendy Davis on Nov. 4,” the ad wraps up.

Will this make Davis competitive in deep-red Texas? No, probably not. OK, almost certainly not. She’s run well behind the GOP nominee, state Attorney General Greg Abbott, throughout the campaign, and at this point, she is almost 13 percentage points behind, according to the RealClearPolitics rolling average of polls.

Davis may have the first lady on her side, but Mr. Abbott has a TV spot that’s widely acclaimed as one of the most effective of the 2014 political cycle.

Abbott has used a wheelchair since an accident in 1984. The ad shows how he strengthened himself by rolling up an eight-story parking garage. “Just one more, I would tell myself, just one more,” he says in the voice-over.

Politico rated it the top viral political ad of the year.

Anyway, the Democratic Party knows Davis is a very long shot, because Mrs. Obama isn’t actually visiting the state. The first lady remains a popular surrogate campaigner – her favorability ratings are about 20 points higher than those of her husband – and as she hits the trail in the last weeks before the midterm elections, she’ll probably go in person only to where she might actually swing a race.

On Friday, for instance, Mrs. Obama is going to Michigan, where there’s a close race for an open Senate seat, and Democratic Rep. Gary Peters is edging ahead of the GOP’s Terri Lynn Land.

On the same day, she’ll swing through Iowa in support of Democrat Bruce Braley, who’s trailing Republican Joni Ernst by less than two percentage points, according to averages of major polls.

The first lady has also campaigned in person this week in Illinois (a blue state), Wisconsin (purple state), and Maine (where Democrat Mike Michaud has a shot at unseating Republican Gov. Paul LePage). She’s also campaigned in Massachusetts, and in September went to Georgia to try to boost the fortunes of Senate candidate Michelle Nunn.

Cutting an ad isn’t that difficult. It takes little time and can be a morale boost for candidates who the party thinks might have a future or are otherwise. But if you want to see where parties think they really have a shot, look at where they send their popular figures in the final weeks of a campaign.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.