Democrats slam Chris Christie on 'Bridgegate'. Why now?

The 'Bridgegate' scandal has hurt Chris Christie, but he's still running hard for the GOP nomination for president. Democrats are hoping to remind voters why his favorability rating has dropped.

|
Mel Evans/AP
Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (l.), and New Jersey Democratic State Committee chairman John Currie (r.) listen as New Jersey Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman (D) of Trenton, N.J., addresses a gathering near the George Washington Bridge as they discuss Gov. Chris Christie and the lane closings there nearly one year ago Monday, Sept. 8, 2014, in Fort Lee, N.J. They also criticized Christie, the potential 2016 presidential contender, for his handling on the state's economy and his frequent out-of-state travel.

Remember Bridgegate? Top Democrats want to make sure you do. That’s why they gathered in Fort Lee, N.J., Monday to highlight the one-year anniversary of the George Washington Bridge lane-closing scandal linked to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and a posse of state party officials gathered at the Fort Lee Historic Park to slam Gov. Christie for the traffic jam, as well as his handling of the state economy and frequent travel outside New Jersey’s verdant bounds.

On Sept. 9, 2013, the New Jersey Port Authority abruptly closed some lanes on the GWB, causing massive gridlock on Fort Lee streets. Political retribution against the Fort Lee mayor, a Democrat who refrained from endorsing Christie in his gubernatorial reelection campaign, may have been the point of this move.

Some Christie staffers and appointees resigned in the scandal’s wake. No evidence has emerged to tie Christie directly to the order to roll out the orange cones, but federal authorities and New Jersey lawmakers are still investigating the matter.

“Bridgegate began Christie’s downfall. His popularity sank. His approval rating declined. More people began to dislike him and disapprove of the job he is doing,” said Representative Wasserman-Schultz of Florida in her Fort Lee appearance.

Why are Democrats piling on Christie? Perhaps they’re waving the Bridgegate flag because Christie’s presidential hopes haven’t been dashed at all over the last 12 months.

He continues to run hard in the pre-voting stage of the race, where candidates cross the nation to raise money, make contacts, and shake hands in Iowa and New Hampshire. According to early polls, he’s now the GOP frontrunner: the RealClearPolitics rolling average of major surveys of Republican voters on Sept. 8 has Christie leading second-place Jeb Bush by 0.7 percent.

So the DNC is doing to Christie what the RNC is doing to Hillary Clinton. They’re trying to ding the first-place person of the other party in order to keep their negatives up in advance of actual primaries. And Democrats have long worried that Christie, as a relatively moderate Northeasterner, could be a tough general election opponent.

But 0.7 percent isn’t a lead, really, especially this early in the race. And there’s also evidence that Bridgegate has undermined Christie’s national appeal in a manner that might hurt him when actual voting starts.

Christie’s favorability rating is now underwater, for instance. According to the Huffington Post’s Pollster average, 47 percent of Americans view him negatively and 30 percent positively. That’s close to the exact opposite of the numbers he enjoyed one year ago, when his favorable rating was riding high.

Look at the Pollster graph of Christie’s favorable rating and it looks like an “X” lying on its side. The crossing point is centered on January of this year, when news about Bridgegate exploded. Yes, correlation is not causality, but it sure looks like it’s the Fort Lee traffic jam that’s caused a plurality of Americans to look at Christie in a negative light.

Republicans as well as Democrats and independents now have a much less rosy view of Christie’s performance and personality. In July a Gallup survey found he had the lowest net favorable rating of any potential Republican candidate among GOP voters: negative 10 percent.

Thus Monday’s press conference by Democrats is likely an attempt to remind voters about what caused them to change their opinion of Christie in the first place.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Democrats slam Chris Christie on 'Bridgegate'. Why now?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2014/0908/Democrats-slam-Chris-Christie-on-Bridgegate-.-Why-now
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe