Hillary Clinton says 'struggled' with debt. How rich is she now?

True, the Clintons were in the red when they left the White House. But after income from speeches and books, Hillary Clinton is almost eight times as rich as President Obama.

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters
Hillary Clinton smiles at a girl during a signing of her new book 'Hard Choices' in New York June 10, 2014. Ms. Clinton says she and Bill were 'dead broke' when they left the White House.

Hillary Rodham Clinton says she and Bill were “dead broke” when they left the White House in 2001. Legal fees associated with President Clinton’s impeachment over aspects of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky left the couple roughly $12 million in debt, the former secretary of State told ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

Ms. Clinton argues that because of their financial straits, she understands what it means for ordinary Americans to struggle to make ends meet. But Republicans have leapt on this comment as a means to try to portray her as out of touch.

True, they were in the red when the gates of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue shut behind them. However, Mr. Clinton was in line to receive an annual $200,000 pension as an ex-president. Ms. Clinton had been elected to the US Senate from New York.

Their real problem was that they needed to scrabble to make enough cash to live like “their rich and famous pals, and to do that they had to milk their fame for all it has been worth,” charges conservative Jennifer Rubin Tuesday on her “Right Turn” Washington Post blog.

Since then, the couple has made more than $100 million in income from speeches and books. Their net worth is an estimated $10 million to $50 million.

Will this spat over finances have any actual electoral effect? We’d say the chances of that are close to zero. Voters do think a candidate’s ability to relate to average folks is important, but they tend to judge that by how the candidate performs on television. President George W. Bush rated high on this score, for instance, and he’s worth $20 million himself.

No, Ms. Clinton’s biggest problem at the moment isn’t some slip of the tongue. It isn’t even her role in whatever happened in Benghazi, points out Brendan Nyhan, an assistant professor of government at Dartmouth. It’s Obama fatigue.

“A far more significant threat to her potential candidacy is Americans’ desire for new leadership after eight years of the Obama administration,” writes Professor Nyhan recently in The New York Times’s policy section “The Upshot.”

Nyhan points to a recent Pew/USA Today poll that finds that 65 percent of Americans would like to see a president who offers policies and programs different from those of the current administration. Only 30 percent would like policies and programs similar to those of President Obama.

OK, but just out of curiosity, how rich are the Clintons, anyway?

In terms of US presidents, they’re pretty wealthy, according to a list of the net worth of all US chief executives compiled by the 24/7 Wall St. site.

This list, updated earlier this year, pegs Mr. Clinton’s net worth at the high end of most estimates: $55 million. That would be good enough to make him the 11th richest president, out of 44 who have served so far.

By extension, that means Ms. Clinton is almost eight times as rich as Mr. Obama, in case you’re interested. His net worth is listed as $7 million.

The richest president of all time? That would be John F. Kennedy, whose family estate, amassed by his Wall Street financier father Joseph P. Kennedy, approached $1 billion in today’s dollars.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.