North Korea almost done building new reactor. Is that a big deal?

While all things in North Korea are cloaked in secrecy, it appears that this new reactor could produce material for nuclear weapons – potentially expanding North Korea's small stockpile.

This file satellite image shows the area around the Yongbyon nuclear facility in North Korea last summer.

Is North Korea almost done building a new, experimental light water reactor at its Yongbyon nuclear facility? Two well-known US nonproliferation experts think that’s the case. In an analysis of commercial satellite imagery posted at the North Korea-centered blog 38 North, Jeffrey Lewis of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies and Nick Hansen of Stanford University conclude that Pyongyang “is in the final ‘clean up’ stage of construction at the reactor site.”

Overhead photos show North Korean workers put a dome over the reactor containment building last year. They started moving large equipment into the building in the fall.

Pipes for a cooling system that draws water from a nearby river have been put in trenches and covered up, according to Mr. Lewis and Mr. Hansen. A nearby electrical sub-station is close to ready. The site’s large crane has been dismantled and taken away. Workers haven’t yet made final electrical and water connections.

The key now is whether a nearby uranium enrichment facility has produced fissile material that North Korea has managed to fabricate into fuel rods.

“If the North has solved these problems and fuel is indeed available, the facility could begin a start-up period by mid-2013 that precedes the facility becoming fully operational,” Lewis and Hansen write.

Would this be a big deal?

Yes. First, let’s back up a bit and provide background. Earlier this year, North Korea announced that it would restart a shuttered 5 MWe gas graphite reactor at Yongbyon, some 55 miles north of Pyongyang. That’s a different plant than the one Lewis and Hansen analyze in their post.

The gas graphite reactor was shuttered in 2007 per international disarmament talks, which have since stalled. US experts believe it produced the plutonium that North Korea has used to fashion a small arsenal of nuclear devices. Stanford University nuclear expert Siegfried Hecker, who toured the site in 2010, estimates a restart would take at least six months. It would then produce another 12 kilograms of weapon-usable plutonium in three to four years, said Mr. Hecker in an interview posted on the website of Stanford’s Center for International Security and Cooperation earlier last month.

The light water reactor nearing completion at the same Yongbyon complex is a technology test facility that is designed to produce electric power, according to North Korea. But it could also provide Pyongyang a second stream of plutonium production.

“That reactor type is not ideal for producing weapons-grade plutonium, but all reactors produce plutonium that could be used in a nuclear explosion,” writes Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Program at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

Furthermore, North Korea has constructed a uranium-enrichment facility at Yongbyon, ostensibly to produce the uranium fuel needed to power the light water reactor. But with a few technical tweaks the spinning centrifuges at that plant could be used to produce highly-enriched uranium, another fissile material used to make nuclear bombs.

So that’s the bottom line: Pyongyang appears to be careening towards a future in which it has multiple means of making explosive fissile cores, the better to expand its currently small stockpile of nuclear weapons.

That’s a future the US and its allies in the region want to avoid.

“Despite its recent threats, North Korea does not yet have much of a nuclear arsenal because it lacks fissile materials and has limited nuclear testing experience,” said Stanford’s Hecker, a former director of the Los Alamos National Lab, in April. “In the long term, it’s important to keep it that way; otherwise North Korea will pose a much more serious threat.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to North Korea almost done building new reactor. Is that a big deal?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today