Jon Stewart channels Dr. Seuss to mock Obama's 'red line' on Syria

Jon Stewart joins a chorus of critics poking fun at President Obama's shifting red line on Syria. But polls signal that most Americans oppose US involvement in Syria – or aren't following the issue.

  • close
    Jon Stewart speaks during a taping of 'The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,' in New York, Oct. 2012. Stewart mocked the President Obama's ever shifting 'red line' on Syria Tuesday night on 'The Daily Show.'
    Carolyn Kaster/AP/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

When it comes to Syria, President Obama’s not much better that a spineless parent issuing empty threats.

At least, that’s according to Jon Stewart of "The Daily Show," who mocked the president’s ever shifting “red line” on Tuesday night’s episode.

That red line, as Mr. Obama has sternly asserted time and again, is the use of chemical weapons by the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Recommended: Chemical weapons 101: Six facts about sarin and Syria’s stockpile

“You cross that line, mister, you are grounded,” Mr. Stewart warned an imaginary President Assad.

Flash to footage of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel confirming, "with some degree of varying confidence," that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons.

And back to Stewart, gleefully awaiting the fire and brimstone about to rain down on Assad.

…And waiting.

“We don’t know how they were used, when they were used, who used them,” Obama said Tuesday in a press conference, walking back his threatening stance.

This line so tickled Stewart, he went Seussical.

“Did he use them in a boat? Did he use them with a goat? Did he use them in a house? Did he use them with a mouse?” (From Obama’s new book, “Red Lines and Gas,” if you’re interested.)

The new red line, it seems, has shifted. (We hope Obama’s using erasable ink.)

Spooked perhaps by the specter of the Iraq war, the US says it now has to present hard evidence of chemical weapons use to the UN. Notably, it needs to persuade Russia that the Assad regime used deadly sarin gas against its own people.

“So intervention in Syria relies on us convincing Vladimir Putin that it’s bad to poison people?” a dubious Stewart asked.

In fact, Obama’s reluctance to engage Assad is no surprise.

For starters, polls show Americans just don’t care about Syria, with fewer than 1 in 5 respondents telling the Pew Research Center that they are following the situation in Syria closely. (If you’re still reading this, congratulations! You’re in the minority.)

According to a recent CBS/New York Times poll, 62 percent of the American public say the US has no responsibility to take action in Syria.

That reluctance to intervene is a byproduct of the 10-year war in Iraq, an exercise few Americans are eager to repeat.

That war’s controversial beginnings (remember WMDs and talk of mushroom clouds?) and exceptionally challenging mission have resulted in a sort of war weariness among not only the public, but American leadership, as well.

Hence Obama’s shifting red line, of which North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has, no doubt, taken note.

He’s not the only one. If Obama’s weak ultimatum on Syria is any indication, we bet Sasha and Malia are not too worried about Obama's tattoo threat, either.

They have enjoyed some unauthorized West Wing pranking, scot-free.


We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.