Polls: Good news for Democrats in Kansas Senate race

Republicans have a good chance of taking control of the US Senate in the November election. But one race could trip them up: The close fight between incumbent Pat Roberts and independent challenger Greg Orman, who's leading in most polls.

Charlie Riedel/AP
Independent U.S. Senate candidate Greg Orman talks to workers at a healthcare company in Overland Park, Kan.

Beyond a certain point, the US Senate race in Kansas was always going to be close and it was always going to be weird.

With no Democratic Party challenger on the ballot, three-term Republican incumbent Pat Roberts still feels the hot, threatening breath of possible defeat in the form of independent Greg Orman.

Sen. Roberts – an establishment Republican who most Kansans think spends too much time in Washington – fought off a tea party challenger in the GOP primary. But this past week he brought in tea party darling Sarah Palin to help generate pro-Roberts enthusiasm among the GOP's disgruntled right wing. Other leading Republicans are headed to Kansas too to help out in a race that could determine control of the Senate.

Let Monitor political reporter Linda Feldmann set the scene:

Kansas became the most unusual Senate race this cycle on Sept. 3, when the Democratic nominee, Chad Taylor, dropped out (at the urging of his own party). Independent candidate Greg Orman, a wealthy businessman, had proved a more viable opponent, both in message and in fundraising, and the Democrats wanted to go head-to-head against the incumbent. Roberts had been running a lackluster reelection effort, including a bumbling admission that he doesn’t own a home in Kansas. The GOP has sent in top strategists to save Roberts.  

The Democrats (and Mr. Orman) got a boost in mid-September when the Kansas Supreme Court ruled that Democrat Taylor's name shouldn’t appear on the November ballot, which set up a one-on-one fight between Orman and Roberts.

The challenger got another boost Sunday in a new NBC/Marist poll showing the incumbent trailing Orman by 10 percentage points (38-48). By 47-37 percent, a plurality of likely Kansas voters have an unfavorable view of Roberts. Orman, on the other hand, enjoys a 46-26 percent favorable/unfavorable rating, according to this poll.

Roberts is "in a great deal of trouble out there,” says Marist pollster Lee Miringoff. “He’s got high negatives, his intensity of support is low, he’s losing independents by more than two to one. His to-do list is rather large in the remaining time before Election Day.”

The race is closer in a recent USA Today/Suffolk University poll, but Orman is ahead here too (46-41 percent). The Real Clear Politics polling average has Orman ahead by five points as well.

Still, Kansas may be an outlier in the broader trend toward a GOP takeover of the US Senate.

In his online "Crystal Ball," Larry Sabato, founder and director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, puts it this way:

"So many undecided contests are winnable for the GOP that the party would have to have a string of bad luck – combined with a truly exceptional Democratic get-out-the-vote program – to snatch defeat from the wide-open jaws of victory. Or Republicans would have to truly shoot themselves in the foot in at least one race, which has become a clear possibility over the last few weeks in Kansas."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.