Chris Christie bridge scandal: Did press conference save his future?

A contrite Chris Christie fired a top aide, and issued apologies after learning of his associates' involvement in causing a massive traffic jam in Fort Lee, N.J., last September. 

Mel Evans/AP
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gestures during a news conference Thursday at the Statehouse in Trenton, N.J. Governor Christie has fired a top aide who arranged traffic jams to punish a mayor who didn't endorse Christie for re-election.

To save his political future, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie needed to cover major ground in his marathon press conference Thursday over a scandalous traffic jam on the George Washington Bridge last September, political observers say.

Governor Christie (R), seen as a likely candidate for president in 2016, needed to apologize, fire someone, and look completely sincere in the process.

He did all of the above. But Christie’s not out of the woods on “Bridgegate.” His reputation for managerial skill and straight talk has been dinged, even as he maintained he had no involvement or knowledge of the traffic scheme. Some questions remain. And he is now on notice that if anything new comes out that contradicts what he said Thursday, he may not recover.

E-mails released Wednesday showed top Christie associates were involved in deliberately creating a four-day traffic jam last September in Fort Lee, N.J., after lanes onto the George Washington Bridge were blocked for a “traffic study.” Millions of commuters were stuck. Police and emergency response vehicles were delayed in reaching people in need. The blockage was an apparent act of retribution against the mayor of Fort Lee, a Democrat, who did not endorse Christie in his reelection bid last fall.

The episode is “definitely a mark against him, but on the flip side it’s the first true test of whether he’s ready for prime time in a 2016 run,” says Republican strategist Ford O’Connell. “Lord knows what Democratic trackers will pop up against him. But right now, he’s saying and doing the right thing.”

When asked if Christie was still a viable candidate for 2016, House Speaker John Boehner told reporters: “I think so. I think so.”

The US attorney for New Jersey launched a probe into the matter Thursday. Questions in the matter remain, such as the nature and author of redacted material on the newly released e-mails.

At his nearly two-hour press conference in Trenton, N.J., Christie said he was “embarrassed and humiliated” to discover that a top adviser and other associates were complicit in the traffic jam after having been assured previously they were not involved.  

In one e-mail published Wednesday in the Bergen (N.J.) Record, Bridget Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff to Christie, wrote on Aug. 13: “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.”

“Got it,” replied David Wildstein, a Christie appointee at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who went to high school with Christie. Mr. Wildstein, who ordered the traffic lanes closed, resigned last month after the scandal broke. At a hearing Thursday in the state legislature, Wildstein declined to testify, asserting his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

At his press conference, Christie announced that he had fired Ms. Kelly after discovering she had lied to him about her involvement in the traffic jam.

“I am heartbroken that someone who I permitted to be in that circle of trust for the last five years betrayed my trust,” Christie said.

He also told his former campaign manager, Bill Stepien, to withdraw his nomination for state Republican Party chairman as well as his consultancy with the Republican Governors Association, of which Christie just became chairman.

Christie said he was “disturbed by the tone and behavior and attitude, callous indifference, that was displayed in e-mails” by Mr. Stepien.

“I’ve come out here today to apologize to the people of New Jersey,” Christie said at the start of his news conference. “I apologize to the people of Fort Lee, and I apologize to members of the state legislature.”

Later on Thursday, he traveled to Fort Lee to apologize to the mayor in person. Christie’s tone of contrition came in marked contrast to the sarcasm he displayed in his first public response to the allegations over the cause of the traffic jam.

"I worked the cones, actually," Christie said at a news conference last month. "Unbeknownst to everybody I was actually the guy out there, in overalls and a hat."

"You really are not serious with that question,” he added.

Such language is classic Christie, known for being combative at times with the press, constituents, Democrats, Republicans – essentially anyone whose question he doesn’t like. He can be entertaining, or come across as a bully, or both.

But given the bridge scandal, his style now raises questions over whether payback is also part of his repertoire, and whether this episode compromises his ability to serve, as a reporter asked. Left unsaid was whether it also hurts his potential to become president.

“Politics ain’t bean bag, OK?” Christie said.

“I feel passionately about issues,” he continued. “And I don't hide my emotions from people. I am not a focus-group tested, blow-dried candidate or governor.”

He also recalled being asked after his landslide reelection in November – with strong bipartisan support – whether he would change his style to appeal to a broader audience.

“And I think I said no, because I am who I am,” Christie said. “But I am not a bully.”

That final statement will surely be replayed countless times in the months ahead, as press scrutiny continues over Bridgegate – and a potential presidential run.

For now, Christie remains a strong contender. Quinnipiac University released a poll Thursday showing that Christie is the “hottest” politician in the country. The survey asked voters to rate their feelings toward potential presidential candidates from zero (meaning cold) to 100 for hot.

Christie scored a mean temperature of 55.5 degrees. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) came in seventh overall at 48.5 degrees, but first among Democrats.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Chris Christie bridge scandal: Did press conference save his future?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today