Could 'fiscal cliff' push US into recession? Four questions answered

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) warned in a report Tuesday that if Congress does not deal with a raft of fiscal measures by Dec. 31, the US could enter another recession. So what is this fiscal cliff and what is Congress doing about it? 

3. Why not push the whole thing off a year?

Whitney Curtis/AP/File
Tea party protesters have helped made the debt a top priority in Washington.

The CBO points out that the reason we’re having this debate is because of America’s long-term debt problems.

At present, the America’s debt held by the public stands at 73 percent of its GDP. Under a middle-of-the-road scenario constructed by the CBO – which allows some tax cuts or spending increases to continue while disallowing others – debt would rise to 93 percent of GDP by 2022. 

Without changes, “debt would be substantially higher,” the CBO wrote. “However, debt cannot continually increase as a share of the economy: Policy changes would be required at some point. The longer the necessary adjustments in policies were delayed, and the more that debt increased, the greater would be the negative consequences.”
 
 What would the negative consequences be?

  • Less flexibility in times of crisis. Higher debt limits decrease the government’s ability to alter its spending course during moments of national stress. If you get into a car wreck and don’t have enough savings, you can put the repairs on your credit card and pay it back over time. If you’ve already maxed your credit card, however, your busted chariot may have to go without. The problem is that when disaster hits the US government it’s usually in the form of a financial panic, a terror attack, or a war. Doing nothing is not politically feasible.
  • More taxpayer money going to interest. Increasing debt levels mean that interest payments on the debt chew up a higher and higher share of government revenues. Every dollar to an interest payment is one dollar that isn’t building a bridge, paying a soldier or helping the US invest in innovation and education. In other words, high debt levels make the government less and less effective – and America less prosperous – over time.
  • Risk of investors upping interest rates. Higher debt makes government finances more unstable. If government finances deteriorate further due to another recession, investors could get spooked and drive up interest rates on US government debt. When that happens, the government may not be able to borrow at rates it can afford and instead would have to institute spending cuts that are sudden and drastic – as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan says, that would be a “bitter austerity” along the lines currently confronting several debt-strapped European nations.
  • Undercutting confidence. Lastly, letting the debt debate linger undercuts American business confidence as well as confidence in the nation’s political institutions. Were America to solve its debt problem, this argument goes, entrepreneurs and business owners would have the certainty they need to forge ahead and help grow the economy. "You can't cut and tax your way alone out of this challenge around the debt if you don't have the third leg of the stool, which is growing the economy," said Sen. Mark Warner (D) of Virginia.
3 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.