Congressional hearing dissects classified-documents probe of Biden

President Joe Biden’s testimony over his handling of classified documents has been released to the public. The details sparked debate as special counsel Robert Hur appeared before Congress.

|
Nathan Howard/AP
Special Counsel Robert Hur walks to the hearing of the House Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 12, 2024. Mr. Hur said he stands by his decision not to recommend criminal charges for President Biden.

Lawmakers turned a March 12 hearing on President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents into a proxy battle between the Democratic president and Republican front-runner Donald Trump, as a newly released transcript of Mr. Biden’s testimony last fall showed that he repeatedly insisted he never meant to retain classified information after he left the vice presidency.

Special counsel Robert Hur, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, stood steadfastly by the assessments in his 345-page report that questioned Mr. Biden’s age and mental competence but recommended no criminal charges.

“What I wrote is what I believe the evidence shows, and what I expect jurors would perceive and believe,” Mr. Hur said. “I did not sanitize my explanation. Nor did I disparage the president unfairly.”

The transcript of hours of interviews between Mr. Biden and the special counsel released March 12 provides a more textured picture of the roughly yearlong investigation, filling in some of the gaps left by Mr. Hur’s and Mr. Biden’s accounting of the exchanges. But there was no guarantee the hearing or transcript would alter preconceived notions about the president, the special counsel who investigated him, or Mr. Trump, particularly in a hard-fought election year.

While Mr. Biden was adamant that he treated classified information seriously, the transcript shows that he was at times fuzzy about dates and details and said he was unfamiliar with the paper trail for some of the sensitive documents he handled.

The hearing played out as both Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump were on the cusp of claiming their party’s nominations, and the party lines calcified almost immediately over which leader meant to hang on to classified documents, or rather, who “willfully” retained them – and who didn’t.

Republicans argued Mr. Biden was being given a pass by his own Justice Department and that Mr. Trump had been unfairly victimized by prosecutors. Democrats, for their part, stressed Mr. Biden’s cooperation in the investigation and strongly contrasted that with the separate criminal case against Mr. Trump, who refused to return classified documents requested by the National Archives that he had at his Florida estate.

Democrats started off their questioning by hitting hard at the contrast between Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump, focusing more on the latter’s criminal case. Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, the ranking Democrat, asked whether Mr. Biden’s willingness to comply with investigators and turn over documents contributed to the decision not to charge him.

“That was a factor in our analysis,” Mr. Hur said.

Republicans, meanwhile, insisted Mr. Trump was being unfairly singled out and vilified, questioning how the two cases were really all that different.

Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., called it a “glaring double standard.”

“Donald Trump’s being prosecuted for exactly the same act that you documented Joe Biden committed,” he told Mr. Hur.

Mr. Hur’s report cited evidence that Mr. Biden willfully held on to highly classified information and shared it with a ghostwriter, based on audio of the conversations between the two men in which Mr. Biden said he had just come across some classified documents at his home.

According to the transcript, Mr. Biden said he did not recall the exchange, or that he had actually discovered any documents. He said if he had discussed anything questionable with the ghostwriter, it was in referring to a 20-page sensitive memo he had written to then-President Barack Obama in 2009 arguing against surging troops in Afghanistan that he wanted to ensure didn’t make it into publication.

Mr. Hur said he was aware of the need to explain in great detail why he’d decided not to charge the president and why the case didn’t meet the standard for criminal charges. Such explanations are common but usually kept confidential. 

But there’s a tradition at the Justice Department to release such documents publicly and so as Mr. Hur was working on his report, he almost certainly would have understood that the document was going to see the light of the day.

“I knew that for my decision to be credible, I could not simply announce that I recommended no criminal charges and leave it at that. I needed to explain why.”

In his interviews, Mr. Biden repeatedly told prosecutors that he did not know how classified documents ended up at his home and former Penn Biden Center office in Washington.

“I have no idea,” he said.

He also insisted that had he known they were there, he would have returned them to the government.

The president did acknowledge that he intentionally held on to his personal diaries – which officials said contained classified information. Mr. Biden insisted were his own property, a claim also asserted by previous presidents and vice presidents, and that he had a right to keep them.

He also acknowledged that he was “never that organized,” as prosecutors pressed him on why some of the documents were located in different places.

Mr. Hur, in his report, detailed how his findings about Mr. Biden were far different from those of special counsel Jack Smith about Mr. Trump, who has been charged with willfully retaining classified documents.

Mr. Trump hyped March 12 as a “Big day in Congress for the Biden Documents Hoax,” while casting himself as being unfairly targeted.

“The DOJ gave Biden, and virtually every other person and President, a free pass,” he said. “Me, I’m still fighting!!!”

FBI agents searched Mr. Trump’s Florida estate in 2022 and removed boxes of documents marked as classified after he refused multiple requests from the National Archives to return them.

Mr. Biden, by his own admission in the interviews, has retained such a sprawling assortment of photos, documents, and artifacts from his more than 50 years in public life that he can’t keep track of everything.

Mr. Biden first sat down with Mr. Hur during a time of crisis, one day after the devastating Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7.

He entered the first day of the interview having just gotten off the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, part of a series of calls meant to prevent the attack from spiraling into a wider regional confrontation. At multiple points, when Mr. Hur suggested a pause, Mr. Biden encouraged prosecutors to keep going, saying, “I’ll go all night if we get this done.”

Mr. Biden said that he left it to his staff to safeguard classified information that was presented to him, often leaving papers on his desk in heaps for aides to sort through and secure.

“I never asked anybody,” Mr. Biden said. He noted that much of his staff had worked with him for years, to the point where they didn’t need direction from him. 

Confusion over the timing of the death of Mr. Biden’s adult son Beau – who died May 30, 2015 – was highlighted by Mr. Hur in his report as an example of the president’s memory lapses. But the transcript shows that Mr. Hur never asked Mr. Biden about his son specifically, as a visibly angry Biden had suggested in comments to reporters the day the report was released.

The transcript suggests that the exchange was less revealing about Mr. Biden’s memory than Mr. Hur let on, and that Mr. Biden’s recollection of it during his emotional White House remarks was incorrect.

Mr. Hur asked Mr. Biden about where he kept the things that he was “actively working on” while he was living in a rental home in Virginia immediately after leaving the vice presidency in January 2017. And in that context, it was Mr. Biden himself who brought up Beau’s illness and death as he talked about a book he’d published later in 2017 about that painful time.

“What month did Beau die?” Mr. Biden mused, adding, “Oh God, May 30th.”

A White House lawyer then chimed in with the year, 2015.

“Was it 2015 he died?” Mr. Biden asked again.

Mr. Biden went on to recount in detail the story contained in his book, “Promise Me, Dad,” of how his late son had encouraged him to remain engaged in public life after the Obama administration ended.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Associated Press writers Eric Tucker in Washington and Alanna Durkin Richer in Boston contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Congressional hearing dissects classified-documents probe of Biden
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2024/0312/Congressional-hearing-dissects-classified-documents-probe-of-Biden
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe