The truth of mail-in voting? Dems' new research debunks myths.

The partisan fight over ballot access was well under way before the pandemic. Republicans claim mail-in voting will increase voter fraud, while Democrats say resistance to it is another form of voter suppression. 

Paul Ratje/Reuters
An election worker cleans a voting booth during the primary election in Las Cruces, New Mexico, June 2, 2020. Voter Suppression Watch, a Democrat-led effort, aims to counter Republicans’ campaign against mail-in voting by providing opposition research.

Democrats are mounting a new effort to push back against a well-funded Republican campaign that seeks to undermine public confidence in mail-in voting, which President Donald Trump has said, without offering proof, will lead to election fraud.

Fair Fight, an organization led by former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, has joined forces with Priorities USA, the largest Democratic outside group, and American Bridge, the party's opposition research clearinghouse, to form a new effort called Voter Suppression Watch.

The aim is to not only counter Republicans in the courts but in public relations, too, while playing offense by providing opposition research that often forms the grist of critical news stories.

"The 2020 election is the most pivotal election that I can think of, and we have known for a while that there would be efforts made to suppress the vote," Ms. Abrams said Sunday in an interview with The Associated Press. "We need to not only have a concerted effort to push back, but we need to raise awareness, too."

Even before the coronavirus pandemic, a partisan fight over ballot access was playing out in a handful of state courts. But now that the virus has raised fears that in-person voting could be a threat to the elderly, those in poor health, and people of color, whom statistics show have disproportionately borne the brunt of its effects, efforts to expand voting by mail have faced stiff opposition from Mr. Trump and his allies.

They argue, without offering evidence, that it will lead to increased voter fraud, even as they have encouraged Republicans to cast ballots by mail in a number of recent elections. Mr. Trump casts his own ballots by mail.

Democrats say the Republican opposition to mail voting is also a smokescreen being used to push for broader voting limitations.

"While everyone is focusing on the vote-by-mail argument, the architecture of their work is incredibly broad," Ms. Abrams said. "One of our missions will be to raise the resources necessary to push back against their efforts across the country."

Over more than a decade, Republicans have enacted laws at the state level that Democrats argue make it harder for members of their base to vote. These include voter ID laws, efforts to limit polling locations in urban areas, and rules that limit early voting. Republicans have argued that their efforts are aimed at limiting widespread voter fraud, though there's little evidence to back those claims up.

Bolstered by a federal court ruling, for the first time in decades, the GOP will also be allowed to conduct poll monitoring on election day in November.

Historically, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud through mail-in voting. But some social media users have pushed grandiose theories casting doubt on the method. Mr. Trump has encouraged the skepticism, saying during a televised briefing that "a lot of people cheat with mail-in voting." Last month, he tweeted: "Don't allow RIGGED ELECTIONS!"

Democrats and voting rights groups contend they want to protect the voting rights of all citizens, and they note that repeated studies have found no widespread fraud and no partisan benefit to expanded voting.

"We want to build a strong coalition to make sure that what's happening on the Republican side doesn't go unanswered," said Aneesa McMillan, the director of strategic communications and voting rights at Priorities USA.

Thus far, the new Democratic coalition has not raised additional funds for the effort, though that could change. Ms. Abrams, who is among those being considered for Joe Biden's running mate, said she aims to raise millions for the cause.

"I don't think there's a path for Trump getting reelected without voter suppression tactics," said David Brock, a prolific fundraiser who is one of the founders of American Bridge. "While there's an improbable path for Trump to get an Electoral College victory, donors should be paying attention and giving to the overall effort."

His group has already unearthed evidence that Mr. Trump and his allies aim to limit ballot access.

A recording the group provided to the AP in December revealed a Trump adviser told Republicans in Wisconsin, a crucial battleground state, that the GOP was counting on voter suppression tactics to provide an edge on Election Day.

"Traditionally it's always been Republicans suppressing votes in places," Justin Clark, a senior political adviser and senior counsel to Mr. Trump's reelection campaign, told Wisconsin Republicans at a November 2019 event. "Let's start playing offense a little bit. That's what you're going to see in 2020. It's going to be a much bigger program, a much more aggressive program, a much better-funded program."

Democrats say Mr. Trump's claims of voter fraud have morphed what was once a quiet focus of the party into a broader culture war issue.

"You can immediately see it is political," said Ms. McMillan. "The bad thing about Donald Trump is that he says the first thing that comes to his mind; the good thing about Donald Trump is that he says the first thing that comes to mind."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The truth of mail-in voting? Dems' new research debunks myths.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today