From rogue adviser to martyr: Flynn called a 'patriot'

President Donald Trump and Republican allies are using the Justice Department's recent dismissal of the Michael Flynn case as a way to shift attention from the coronavirus crisis, say critics. A judge has yet to rule on the Justice Department's dismissal request. 

Susan Walsh/AP
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn leaves federal court in Washington on Dec. 1, 2017. This week, the Justice Department moved to dismiss the criminal case against Mr. Flynn in the Trump-Russia investigation.

When Michael Flynn was forced from the White House, Vice President Mike Pence said he was disappointed the national security adviser had misled him about his talks with the Russian ambassador. President Donald Trump called the deception unacceptable.

Now Mr. Pence says he'd welcome Mr. Flynn back to the administration, calling him a "patriot," as Mr. Trump pronounces him exonerated.

What a difference three years makes. The Justice Department's move to dismiss the criminal case against Mr. Flynn marks another step in his transformation, in the eyes of Mr. Trump and his allies, from rogue adviser to victim of runaway law enforcement.

The dismissal rewrites the narrative of the case that Mr. Trump's own Justice Department had advanced for the last three years in a way that former law enforcement officials say downplays the legitimate national security concerns they believe Mr. Flynn posed and the consequences of the lies he pleaded guilty to telling.

It's been swept up in a broader push by Mr. Trump and his Republican allies to reframe the Russia investigation as a "deep state" plot to sabotage his administration, setting the stage for a fresh onslaught of election year attacks on past and present Democratic officials and law enforcement leaders.

"His goal is that by the end of this, you're just not really sure what happened and at some gut level enough Americans say, 'It's kind of messy,'" said Princeton University presidential historian Julian Zelizer.

Scrambling to manage the coronavirus and economic crash, Mr. Trump has been eager to shift the focus elsewhere. He has repeatedly called Mr. Flynn "exonerated" and pushed the development as evidence of what he deemed "Obamagate," an allegation the previous administration tried to undermine him during the presidential transition.

Mr. Trump has tried to rally his supporters around the claim to revive enthusiasm among voters disappointed by his handling of the pandemic. He used the first 20 minutes of a recent Fox News interview to attack the Obama administration rather than offer updates on the pandemic.

An investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller found Russians interfered in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf, though it did not allege illegal coordination with Mr. Trump's campaign. Mr. Mueller examined multiple instances of potential obstruction of justice and pointedly noted that he was unable to exonerate Mr. Trump.

But advisers believe painting the previous administration as corrupt can distract from a pandemic crisis that has crippled the economy and killed tens of thousands of people in the U.S. and is an effective line of attack against Mr. Trump's Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, Mr. Obama's vice president, according to four current and former administration officials and Republicans close to the White House not authorized to discuss the matter by name.

The hope is to revive some of the pre-pandemic arguments to cast Mr. Trump, even now as an incumbent, as the political outsider being attacked by the establishment.

Mr. Trump has increasingly lashed out in the year since Mueller's report did not accuse him of a crime or allege a criminal conspiracy between his campaign and Russia. Revelations since then have exposed problems with early days of the FBI's probe, including errors and omissions in applications to surveil an ex-Trump campaign adviser.

Republicans have echoed the attacks and scrutiny.

National intelligence director Richard Grenell declassified a list of names of Obama officials who reportedly asked for Mr. Flynn's identity to be unredacted in intelligence documents, while Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley told the Senate the "rule of law is at risk if the federal government can get away with violating the Constitution to do what they did to Lt. Gen. Flynn."'

Republicans have generated a "thick fog of propaganda," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D- Md. "Trump and his enablers in Congress have a strategy of never admitting anything and always going on the attack."

Attorney General William Barr has said dropping the case against Mr. Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, was in the interests of justice. The department says the FBI had no basis for interviewing Mr. Flynn about his "entirely appropriate" calls and that any imperfect statements he made weren't material to the broader counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign.

But the decision stunned former law enforcement officials involved in the case, including some who say the Justice Department is rewriting history and omitting key context.

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said the FBI was obligated to interview Mr. Flynn about his conversations with the Russian ambassador over sanctions imposed for election interference.

And because White House officials, including Mr. Pence, inaccurately asserted that Mr. Flynn had never discussed sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, U.S. officials were concerned Mr. Flynn could be vulnerable to blackmail since Russia also knew what was discussed.

"Mr. Flynn was set to become the national security adviser, and it was untenable that Russia – which the intelligence community had just assessed had sought to interfere in the U.S. presidential election – might have leverage over him," Mary McCord, the Justice Department's top national security official at the time, wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in which she accused Mr. Barr of misrepresenting her viewpoints.

She acknowledged an internal quarrel over whether to disclose details of Flynn's calls to the White House and about the FBI's decision to interview Flynn without alerting Justice Department leadership. But she said there was no disagreement that Mr. Flynn was a potential counterintelligence threat.

A judge has yet to rule on the Justice Department's dismissal request, opening the door on Tuesday to outside individuals and groups to file briefs.

But in the meantime, Mr. Flynn's revival in Mr. Trump's orbit is perhaps not surprising.

From the moment he took the stage at the 2016 Republican National Convention and led a "Lock her up!" chant aimed at Democrat Hillary Clinton, Mr. Flynn has been exceedingly popular among many Trump supporters. For many, his forced resignation and guilty plea only added to his stature as a martyr and cause célèbre.

Discussions have been held about potentially welcoming him back to a post within the administration or the reelection campaign, according to the officials. Nothing has been finalized.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writer Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.

Editor’s note: As a public service, the Monitor has removed the paywall for all our coronavirus coverage. It’s free.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to From rogue adviser to martyr: Flynn called a 'patriot'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today