Cheers and scoffs: Americans divided over Mueller report summary

For Republicans, the end of the probe means no evidence exists that President Donald Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia during the 2016 election. Democrats argue that while Mr. Trump wasn't charged with obstruction, he also wasn't exonerated.

Carolyn Kaster/AP
President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One on March 24, 2019, in Andrews Air Force Base, Md., as he returns from Mar-a Lago in Palm Beach, Fla. Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed there was no collusion between his 2016 campaign and Russia.

The first glimpse into the special counsel's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election did little to mend a gaping American political divide.

The four-page summary of Robert Mueller's probe released by Attorney General William Barr didn't satisfy many who wanted more details. But in a bitterly divided country, the little bit that was known stirred cheers from many Republicans and scoffs from many Democrats.

"The one side that's happy is happy. And the other side that's not happy wants to do some more investigation or do something else," said Stephen Turner, an electrical engineer from Belmont, North Carolina, who is Republican and voted for President Donald Trump. "I wish it'd just go away."

Across the union, the split reaction to the Mueller news repeated.

In West Palm Beach, Florida, along the route Mr. Trump's motorcade took before returning to Washington on Air Force One, Mary Jude Smith got a wave and a smile from the chief executive. The retiree from Hypoluxo, Florida, speaks about him with passion and insists he has been exonerated. She sees the investigation as Democrats' pathetic attempt to impeach Mr. Trump.

"I think Mueller was a crook. He wasted millions of our tax dollars for nothing," she said, before offering her assessment of Mr. Trump: "He's as clean as the driven snow."

In blue-state New York, filmmaker Dan Lee of Brooklyn Heights felt let down by Mr. Mueller and left with more questions than answers.

"It stings a little, because I trusted Mueller," said Mr. Lee, a Democrat. "There are still so many questions and it seems inconceivable that obstruction isn't one of the conclusions."

In red-state West Virginia, truck driver Michael Tucker of Bancroft declared the Russian investigation "a joke, for the most part" and that Mr. Trump has been treated unfairly.

"It's one witch hunt after another," said Mr. Tucker, who gave his vote to Mr. Trump in 2016 and likely will again next year. "If they could have found anything, they would have."

There were morsels in Mr. Barr's letter both sides could savor. For Republicans, it was acknowledgement that there was no evidence Mr. Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia. For Democrats, it was the admission that while Trump wasn't charged with obstruction, he also wasn't exonerated.

Mr. Trump supporter Richard C. Osburn, a nurse from South Charleston, West Virginia, said Mr. Mueller's findings were proof the president was "drug through the mud." He knows Democrats are "hell-bent" on destroying Mr.Trump, but says it's time for the president to be given a break.

"The things that the man's doing to try to help the average worker in this country never gets recognized by the mainstream media," said Mr. Osburn, a longtime Republican. "They would rather hate, hate, hate than recognize accomplishments. Those days have got to stop."

In Los Angeles, accountant Sue Arani checked news on her phone as she took her dog for an afternoon walk Sunday. She calls herself a Republican-leaning voter, though she gave her support to Clinton in 2016. She trusts Mr. Mueller, but even with Mr. Barr's release, she thinks there was collusion between Mr. Trump's campaign and the Russian government.

"The public needs to see the report," she said, "especially before the next election."

Claire Finkelstein, a University of Pennsylvania professor who founded the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law, said if the full report isn't made available to the public and its contents become known only through leaks and back channels, it would be damaging to faith in the government.

"Secrets are where conspiracy theories fester and grow," Ms. Finkelstein said. "The only way that we are going to be able to move past this state of affairs is by as much coming out into the light as possible. Let's flesh out the facts, let's get them on the table and have a robust conversation."

What seemed certain was there would be no end to the debate over Mr. Trump, Mr. Mueller's investigation, and the political divide across the United States.

In Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Richard Howell, a supporter of the president, said news of the Mueller report proves what critics of the investigation have been saying all along.

"So we spent two years and millions of dollars," he said, "worrying about nothing."

In Gaston County, North Carolina, Mr. Trump voters outnumbered Clinton backers nearly two-to-one in 2016, but Joy Owens didn't budge from her opposition. She believes Mr. Mueller has done a good job with the investigation but she's left feeling unfulfilled.

"I keep hoping that if we just be patient, we be patient for a little bit longer, that there will be justice," said Ms. Owens, who recently retired from running a yarn shop and framing business. "I cannot believe of all the other convictions that are happening about this that Trump is going to be scot-free on this."

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Corey Williams, Sharon Cohen, Chris Weber, Claire Galofaro, Jeff Baenan, Rebecca Santana, Tim Talley, Alanna Durkin Richer, Denise Lavoie, Josh Replogle, Colleen Slevin, Sarah Blake Morgan, Roxana Hegeman, Adam Geller, and John Raby contributed to this report. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.