How women in Congress have fought for equal treatment within the halls of Capitol Hill

In the traditionally male national political sphere, female lawmakers have had to push for accommodations, such as women's bathrooms and locker rooms in Congressional buildings.

Andrew Harnik/AP
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D) of California speaks at a news conference in Washington on Nov. 1. In an effort to accommodate women's needs in Congress, Representative Pelosi created designated areas for nursing mothers in House buildings.

They sponsor bills. They pass laws. They're some of the most powerful politicians in the United States.

But they couldn't even wear pants to work until the mid-1990s.

There may be more women in Congress than ever before, but Capitol Hill hasn't come close to achieving gender parity. And recent revelations of sexual harassment of female aides and even lawmakers by their male counterparts have thrust the "boys' club" culture of Congress into the spotlight.

Here is a timeline of hard-won victories for women in Congress, as they fought to achieve equal treatment and access.

1962: Women in Congress press for the establishment of a women's-only lounge on the first floor of the Capitol. That year, H-235 was dedicated as a powder room and lounge for female members, and included the only women's restroom on the premises; the men's bathroom was situated right outside of the House floor. The reading room was re-named after former Rep. Lindy Boggs (D) of Louisiana in 1991, and remains the only room in the Capitol named after a woman. (20 congresswomen; 2 senators, 18 House members)

1965: Congress opens a "Ladies Health Facility" for female members. The facility was significantly smaller than the two-floor men's gym in the Rayburn House Office Building, which also had a locker room and pool for use by male members. The women's facility was inferior, offering antiquated wooden rowing machines and wooden bars; Rep. Pat Schroeder (D) of Colorado described the facility as "six hair dryers and a ping-pong table," according to the Office of the House Historian. (13 congresswomen; 2 senators, 11 House members)

1969: Rep. Charlotte T. Reid (R) of Illinois, is credited with being the first woman to wear pants on the House floor; she showed up to work in a "black wool, bell-bottomed pantsuit" and caused a stir. In the decades that followed, female representatives were discouraged from wearing pants, but some continued to do so. (11 congresswomen; 1 senator, 10 House members)

1971: Senate allows the appointment of women in patronage positions, including pages, doorkeepers, elevator operators, and police officers. (15 congresswomen; 2 senators, 13 House members)

1985: The men's gym in the House of Representatives becomes co-ed after Rep. Barbara Boxer (D) of California and two other female members of Congress protest women's exclusion from the facility. The congresswomen re-wrote the lyrics to "Has Anybody Seen My Gal" to reflect the cause, and sang it during a meeting of Democratic whips. The following month, the three-member House gym committee integrated the facility – but didn't add a locker room for women, forcing female members to walk through public corridors in their gym clothes. Congresswomen also had to call an attendant to first make sure the doors to the showers were closed before they would be let inside. (25 congresswomen; 2 senators, 23 House members)

1992: "Year of the Woman": More women win elections than ever before in both the House (24 elected) and the Senate (three elected). (32 congresswomen)

Majority leader George Mitchell (D) of Maine requests the construction of a women's restroom just off the Senate floor sometime around the 1992 election. It was built the following year.

1993: Sens. Barbara Mikulski (D) of Maryland, Nancy Kassebaum (R) of Kansas, and Carol Moseley-Braun (D) of Illinois are credited with being the first to buck tradition by wearing pants on the Senate floor, breaking an unofficial rule that women must wear dresses or skirts. According to other reports, Senate sergeant-at-arms Martha Pope circulated a memo among door attendants updating the dress code to include "coordinated pantsuits" after Moseley-Braun showed up in slacks. (54 congresswomen; 7 senators, 47 House members)

That same year, three female Congress members played in the Congressional Baseball Game for the first time.

2006: The Office of the Attending Physician opens the first dedicated lactation suite in the Russell Senate Office Building where nursing mothers can pump privately. Each room in the suite was equipped with pumps, chairs, TVs, and refrigerators. The following year, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D) of California created dedicated lactation areas in House buildings. (82 congresswomen; 14 senators, 68 House members).

2011: Female members of the House of Representatives get a women's bathroom off the House floor. Since 1962, they had been forced to use the restroom inside the women's reading room. (90 congresswomen; 17 senators, 73 House members).

2013: Senate doubles the size of the women's restroom in order to accommodate increasing number of female lawmakers. (100 congresswomen; 20 senators, 80 House members)

2017: More than 30 female lawmakers from both parties wore sleeveless blouses and dresses during a "Sleeveless Friday" protest of a rule barring congresswomen from showing their arms on the House floor and the adjoining Speaker's Lobby. Speaker Paul Ryan pledged to "modernize" the dress code. (105 congresswomen; 21 senators, 84 House members)

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How women in Congress have fought for equal treatment within the halls of Capitol Hill
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today