Bipartisan advisers urge Congress for continued action on health care

Leading policy advisers from both parties push for the next step in one of the most polarizing issues in Washington.

Susan Walsh/AP/File
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) of Tennessee speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Jan. 12, 2016.

A group of conservative and liberal health policy experts is pressing the Trump administration and Congress to take steps to quickly shore up coverage under the Obama health care law, an idea that's been anathema to President Trump and many congressional Republicans.

The plan, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press, includes continuing federal payments to insurers Mr. Trump has threatened to block. It says Mr. Trump and lawmakers should find a way for people to buy coverage in the handful of counties that may have no insurers next year in the federal and state insurance exchanges created by former President Obama's statute.

In addition, the analysts want the administration to continue urging people to sign up for policies and helping them enroll, which was stressed under Mr. Obama. The Trump administration has signaled it might curtail those outreach programs, one of several steps it's suggested it might take that would undermine the law.

It is unclear whether the recommendations will have much influence on one of the most politically polarizing issues in Washington. The impact might also be blunted because the Senate's jolting July 28 defeat of the GOP effort to repeal Obama's law has left Republicans divided over whether to seek a bipartisan deal with Democrats.

Yet the advice, from leading policy advisers to politicians of both parties, underscores that politics aside, there are steps respected voices from each side agrees could be taken to prop up a law that's expanded coverage to around 20 million Americans. The experts urge action by Sept. 30, the end of the government's budget year.

One signee, Lanhee Chen, policy director for Mitt Romney's 2012 GOP presidential campaign, said that besides risking people losing coverage, "There's also just a very real political price I think to be paid if Republicans allow the system to crash and burn."

Ron Pollack, former director of Families USA, a main proponent of Obama's 2010 law, said the suggestions would "lend encouragement to those that are already inclined to work on a bipartisan basis."

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R) of Tennessee and Sen. Patty Murray (D) of Washington have said they'll try writing legislation to temporarily continue the payments to insurers and ease some of the Obama law's requirements.

The paper says the suggestions are aimed at stabilizing health care markets "until a longer-term resolution can be achieved and, most importantly, to protect coverage and health care access."

The experts want lawmakers to retain some way of prodding healthy people to enroll for health coverage and penalizing them if they don't. The purchase of policies by healthy consumers helps insurers because they are less costly to cover than sicker, more expensive customers.

GOP bills passed by the House and proposed by Senate leaders would abolish Obama's individual mandate, which assesses tax penalties on those who don't buy coverage. Instead, the Republican measures impose higher premiums or long waiting periods for many who were uninsured previously.

The analysts proposed giving the federal government and states more flexibility for programs and a "judicious expansion" of tax-favored health savings accounts.

Trump has threatened to halt federal payments to insurers used to reduce out-of-pocket costs for around 7 million low- and middle-income people. Obama's law obliges insurers to lower their costs and requires the government to reimburse the companies. A federal court temporarily blocked the payments, but Obama and now Trump have continued them.

Others making the recommendations include Gail Wilensky, a Republican economist and former Medicare director, and John McDonough, a senior adviser to the late Sen. Edward Kennedy during passage of Obama's law.

The experts composed the plan as a project of the Convergence Center for Policy Resolution, a bipartisan nonprofit group that looks for solutions to divisive issues.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Bipartisan advisers urge Congress for continued action on health care
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today