FBI candidate Wray to face questions on independence in confirmation hearing

President Trump’s pick for FBI Director, Christopher Wray, will face his confirmation hearing Wednesday and will likely be pressed on his independence from the White House, though supporters assure that ‘he’s no one’s minion.’ 

Andrew Harnik/AP
FBI Director nominee Christopher Wray meets with Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) of Iowa in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, on June 29, 2017. Mr. Wray is President Trump’s pick for FBI director. His confirmation hearing is Wednesday.

President Trump's pick to lead the FBI faces a confirmation hearing Wednesday that will undoubtedly focus on the political tumult surrounding his nomination, with both Democrats and Republicans seeking assurances of his independence from the White House.

Christopher Wray would inherit the nation's top law enforcement agency at a particularly challenging time. Mr. Trump abruptly fired predecessor James Comey, who was widely admired within the agency, during its investigation into Russian meddling in the United States presidential election and potential coordination with the Trump campaign.

Wednesday's hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee could delve into Mr. Wray's lengthy legal career that included a stint as a top Justice Department official in the Bush administration and white collar work at an international law firm with several major corporations and banks as clients.

But lawmakers are more likely to drill into Wray's leadership style and how he would operate under a president who is said to have demanded loyalty from Mr. Comey and who has appeared insensitive to the traditionally bright boundary between the White House and the FBI.

Announced as the nominee in a curt, early morning tweet by Trump, and without the pageantry of a Rose Garden ceremony, the hearing will offer the first public, close-up look at Wray's background.

Those close to him say he's the right man for the job. Attorneys and FBI agents who have worked with Wray describe him as a steady hand, dedicated, and low-key, seemingly impervious to political influence.

An association representing the majority of FBI agents on Monday voiced its support for Wray, saying "he understands the nature of investigative work and the centrality of special agents to the mission of the FBI."

Bill Mateja, a Dallas attorney who worked with Wray in the Justice Department, said "he has a great moral compass and he's no one's minion."

He also might face questions about his relationships with Comey and Robert Mueller, the former FBI director who's now serving as special counsel in charge of the Russia investigation. Trump allies have said Mr. Mueller's closeness to Comey shows he can't lead an unbiased probe. But Trump nominated Wray despite his having worked alongside both men in the Justice Department.

Wray was at the department in 2004 when Comey, then the deputy attorney general, and then-director Mueller threatened to resign during a dispute with the White House over the reauthorization of a domestic surveillance program. Wray stopped Comey in the hallway one night amid resignation rumors with a particular request, according to the 2011 book, "The Threat Matrix."

"Look, I don't know what's going on, but before you guys all pull the rip cords, please give me a heads-up so I can jump with you," Wray is quoted as saying.

Those who know him say that unlike the outspoken Comey, Wray would be a more reserved leader. His reserve could bode well for the agency at a time when its work has been thrust into the center of a political maelstrom.

He has deep experience in Washington, having served as head of the Justice Department's criminal division in the Bush administration, a position that had him overseeing major criminal prosecutions – such as the special task force investigating the Enron collapse – and also developing the US government's legal response to terrorism and national security threats.

Civil liberties advocates have urged senators to press him on his involvement in national security matters during that period, when the government authorized harsh interrogation techniques and routinely shipped terrorism suspects captured on foreign battlefields to Guantanamo Bay. Redacted emails to and from him are included in an ACLU database of memos on the interrogation and detention of terror suspects.

He also could be grilled about his work over the past decade in private practice at King & Spalding in Atlanta, where he's defended large corporations and financial institutions in criminal and civil cases. He provided legal services to Johnson & Johnson, Wells Fargo, Credit Suisse and fantasy sports providers DraftKings and FanDuel, among other big-name clients, according to ethics documents released Monday. If confirmed, he'll have to step aside for a year from matters involving those clients and the firm. He also assisted New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie during the so-called Bridgegate scandal.

Still, Mr. Mateja predicted "smooth sailing" for Wray.

"Chris is a Republican but he doesn't wear his politics on his sleeve. He keeps things close to his vest," Mateja said in a statement. "The public can rest easy that Chris will not be a lackey for Trump."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to FBI candidate Wray to face questions on independence in confirmation hearing
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/0712/FBI-candidate-Wray-to-face-questions-on-independence-in-confirmation-hearing
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe