Pelosi, Schiff call for Nunes recusal from Russia probe

Chairman Devin Nunes is facing calls to step down from an investigation of alleged ties between President Trump's associates and Russian officials after it was revealed that he met secretly with a source last week at the White House.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Representative Devin Nunes (R) of California briefs reporters at the US Capitol on Friday.

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee says Chairman Devin Nunes (R) of California should step down from an investigation of alleged ties between President Trump's associates and Russian officials after it was revealed that Nunes met secretly with a source last week on the White House grounds.

The committee is conducting an investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election and ties between Mr. Trump’s campaign staffers and Russian officials, similar to an investigation launched by the Senate intelligence committee. The difference, Democrats say, is that Mr. Nunes’s leadership injected partisanship into the process.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and the top Democrat on the intelligence committee, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, called on Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation, saying Nunes’s close ties to the White House would cloud his ability to effectively investigate the allegations.

The calls come after it was revealed that Nunes met an unnamed intelligence official at the White House last week. This official, he indicated, showed him intelligence reports including the names of Trump associates, which had been shared among agencies after being caught up in "incidental" surveillance that was targeted at foreign officials' communications.

To Democrats, Nunes' investigation seems like an effort to protect the Republican party and the Trump administration, rather than conduct an investigation of serious allegations.

"Chairman Nunes' discredited behavior has tarnished that office," Ms. Pelosi said in a statement. "Speaker [Paul] Ryan must insist that Chairman Nunes at least recuse himself from the Trump-Russia investigation immediately. That leadership is long overdue."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D) of New York said Nunes’s actions made it appear he was more “interested in protecting the president and his party" than in getting to the bottom of the allegations.

"I believe the public cannot have the necessary confidence that matters involving the president's campaign or transition team can be objectively investigated or overseen by the chairman," Mr. Schiff said.

Mr. Ryan was not eager to heed those calls, and a spokeswoman for the speaker said Monday he has "full confidence that Chairman Nunes is conducting a thorough, fair, and credible investigation."

Nunes says he did not coordinate with Mr. Trump’s aides to arrange the meeting, but he also did not disclose it to Democrats on the intelligence committee, an unusual move on a committee that is working together to uncover evidence.

But Nunes says the documents he examined last week had not been provided to Congress and could not be removed from the White House because of their sensitive nature.

"The chairman is extremely concerned by the possible improper unmasking of names of US citizens, and he began looking into this issue even before President Trump tweeted his assertion that Trump Tower had been wiretapped," said Nunes spokesman Jack Langer.

The Senate intelligence committee, meanwhile, announced Monday that Jared Kushner, Trump’s advisor and son-in-law, has volunteered to be interviewed about having arranged meetings with Russian officials.

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.