Expanded immigration enforcement will not lead to 'mass deportations,' says DHS

In two new memos, Department of Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly called for existing immigration laws to be used 'to the greatest extent practicable.' That doesn't mean mass deportations, officials say.

Andrew Harnik/AP
President Trump arrives at the White House in Washington, Monday, Feb. 20, 2017. Trump administration officials have said that expanded immigration enforcement will not amount to 'mass deportations,' in an effort to calm concerns about a series of memos issued by DHS Secretary John F. Kelly calling for strengthened enforcement of immigration laws.

As the Trump administration steps up its enforcement of immigration law, officials work to reassure communities that the measures are not intended to produce mass deportations.

Over the weekend, media reports disclosed two new memos from Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary John F. Kelly. Unlike executive orders, the memos do not change law but indicate how strenuously the new administration plans to enforce laws that are already on the books. The guidance makes unauthorized immigrants who are convicted of any offense – from shoplifting to being in the country illegally – an enforcement priority. The memos also revive a law that allows the United States to return individuals caught crossing the Mexican border illegally back to Mexico, even if they are third-country nationals, and expand use of a deportation fast-track program. But so-called “Dreamers” – those who arrived as children and work or study and obey the law – will not be targeted.

By substantially broadening the scope of immigration enforcement compared to the Obama administration, Secretary Kelly’s guidance has fueled fears among immigrants and advocacy groups that all immigrants are being targeted and discriminated against. For the White House, however, the new guidance may be a fine balance: an effort to live up to President Trump’s campaign promises in some degree without running into more legal challenges.

Though Congress has passed extensive enforcement laws, it is up to each administration to decide how comprehensively it will enforce these laws, balancing concerns about security and open borders against the economic value unauthorized immigrants may bring. After 2013, when deportations hit a record high 434,000, the Obama administration changed its enforcement guidance in November 2014 to focus on “felons, not families.”

The DHS memos call for far wider-reaching enforcement than under any administration in recent history. This has prompted concerns from immigrant rights advocates that the policies are excessively punitive, potentially driving immigrants into the shadows and making essential local law enforcement more challenging.

“It is irresponsible to treat a hardened criminal the same as an immigrant mother with children for purposes of deportation,” said Sen. Robert Menendez (D) of New Jersey in a statement quoted by The Washington Post, saying the guidance could easily turn into racial profiling.

That concern was echoed by the American Civil Liberties Union, which has said it will fight the new policies in court.

For those who support restricted immigration, however, the guidance strikes a very different tone. They say it’s a long overdue effort to push back against law-breaking.

“The message is: The immigration law is back in business,” said Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports restricted immigration, The New York Times reported. “That violating immigration law is no longer a secondary offense.”

Coming in the wake of a temporary halt on Trump’s temporary travel ban, working within existing laws possibly offers the administration a less contested route to fulfill its promise of a crackdown on immigration. The guidance is intended to support a pair of executive orders he issued last month.

But law enforcement officials attempted to reassure unauthorized immigrants that they would not be facing mass roundups or deportations. Besides questions about the feasibility of policies like sending third-country nationals back to Mexico – which still have to be worked out with the Mexican government – they said the federal government simply does not have the resources to prosecute every unauthorized immigrant for their immigration status alone.

“We do not have the personnel, time or resources to go into communities and round up people and do all kinds of mass throwing folks on buses,” a senior DHS official said on a conference call with reporters, looking to curb the “sense of panic” around the new guidance, The Washington Post reported.

Trump has called for the hiring of thousands more law enforcement agents, as well as the expansion of immigration jails, but Congress would have to approve any additional spending before these measures could be implemented.

Programs like President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which offers unauthorized immigrants who arrived as children a path to work legally in the US, are not affected by the new guidance. Though the program was a target of Trump’s on the campaign trail, he said last week that he would “show great heart” in determining its fate.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Expanded immigration enforcement will not lead to 'mass deportations,' says DHS
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today