Donald Trump livestreams third debate on Facebook: a glimpse into Trump TV?

The Republican nominee livestreamed the third presidential debate through his Facebook page Wednesday, complete with commentary, news crawls, and campaign ads. 

Jim Urquhart/Reuters
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is shown on TV monitors in the media filing room on the campus of University of Nevada, Las Vegas, during the last 2016 US presidential debate on Oct. 19, 2016.

While millions across America tuned in to watch the third and final presidential debate on Wednesday night, roughly 200,000 people witnessed the event through a Facebook Live stream that some are calling the birth of a Trump television network. 

"If you’re tired of biased, mainstream media reporting (otherwise known as Crooked Hillary’s super PAC), tune into my Facebook Live broadcast," the Republican nominee wrote on his Facebook page prior to the event. The broadcast, unlike past live streams of the debate on Donald Trump's Facebook page, featured original pre-debate commentary from Trump surrogates retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn and former Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, news crawl graphics, and Trump-themed campaign advertisements in lieu of regular commercials. 

The live stream comes just days after Trump's son-in-law, New York Observer owner Jared Kushner, reportedly met with investment firm LionTree to discuss the possibility of a Trump TV network, leading to speculation that the Facebook broadcast was a test run of sorts for such an endeavor.

The concept of a Trump-owned television network has been welcomed by supporters of the Republican candidate who are, as he described, frustrated with what they see as "biased, mainstream media reporting." Since the start of his campaign, Mr. Trump has repeatedly criticized the "mainstream media," charging that it is biased against him. The rhetoric has both fueled, and fed off, Americans' all-time lowest trust in the media. 

"A lot of [the media's low approval rating] has to do with what Americans view as dishonest, agenda-laden reporting," Jim Kuypers, author of "Partisan Journalism: A History of Media Bias in the United States," told The Christian Science Monitor in June. "Many Americans," and Trump supporters especially, "are fed up with what they see as a press that talks about free speech, but does not responsibly use that right. To the degree that is there, Trump has tapped into that." 

Last month, Trump told The Washington Post that he had "no interest" in starting his own media company, calling the speculations a "false rumor." 

But, as the Republican nominee has continued to surround himself with media experts including Steve Bannon, the co-founder of the online conservative news site Breitbart, and Roger Ailes, the former Fox News CEO, the rumors have persisted. Now, following the reported talks between Mr. Kushner and LionTree and Wednesday night's Facebook broadcast, industry experts say that a Trump television network, in some form or another, could soon become a reality. 

The network could theoretically exist in a matter of months, if Trump is willing to use new, low-cost streaming models that are quicker and cheaper than setting up a traditional television channel, according to industry analyst Alan Wolk. 

"If he's willing to launch with a limited slate, 5-10 hours of mostly just him, and the rest will come in the next six months, he can get that up in 3-4 months and just build from there," Mr. Wolk told NBC News. 

Others, such as The Atlantic's Derek Thompson, speculate that Trump could launch a multimedia operation such as Glenn Beck's The Blaze, includes a website, radio programs, and a paid subscription digital television network. 

Some have suggested that the Trump campaign is building up to a television network in the event of a loss to Hillary Clinton on Nov. 8. 

"Trump and Bannon have given up on trying to defeat Clinton," wrote Ryan Lizza for The New Yorker this week. "They seem more interested in creating a platform for a new ethno-nationalist politics that may bedevil the Republican Party – and the country – for a long time to come." 

But would such a platform succeed? 

"Donald Trump has an audience, he has a message. It’s a matter of: can that sustain an entire network? I think it’s possible that it could," Glenn Hower, senior analyst for media/entertainment at market research firm Parks Associates, told Fortune. However, he added, similar attempts by political figures – such as Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, who launched a short-lived subscription web channel in 2014 – have failed.

"Just given what we’ve seen in the past, especially with the Palin network, it’s risky," Mr. Hower added. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Donald Trump livestreams third debate on Facebook: a glimpse into Trump TV?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today