Trump issues apology for sexist comments: Is it enough?

Trump issues apology: Late Friday night, the Republican presidential candidate offered an apology for violently sexist comments he made in 2005. Many say that his apology does not erase longstanding attitudes towards women. 

Evan Vucci/AP/File
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a town hall in Sandown, N.H. Trump made a series of lewd and sexually charged comments about women as he waited to make a cameo appearance on a soap opera in 2005. The Republican presidential nominee issued a rare apology Friday, 'if anyone was offended.'

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump found himself in hot water on Friday, after a 2005 hot mic video surfaced, giving viewers (and voters) a first person look into the mind of a younger Mr. Trump.

It wasn’t pretty – the video caught Trump referring to engaging in vulgar and non-consensual sexual acts with “beautiful women,” despite his recent marriage to current wife Melania Trump. After hours of public outcry, Trump finally issued an apology late Friday night.

“I’ve never said I’m a perfect person, nor pretended to be someone that I’m not,” he said in an apology video. “I’ve said and done things that I regret, and the words released today on this more than a decade old video are one of them.”

His apology framed his remarks as "foolish" words and emphasized that his campaign has changed him from the man he was before. Notably, it did not include an apology to any of the women he had discussed in the video, the recipients of his unwanted advances.

In the 2005 video, Trump told Billy Bush of Access Hollywood that he could do what he wanted with women because of his stardom.

After discussing a failed attempt at an affair with an unnamed attractive woman, Trump spotted an attractive actress in the studio where he spoke with Mr. Bush.

“I’ve got to use some Tic-Tacs, just in case I start kissing her,” Trump said in the video. “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful – I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

Trump’s problems with female voters are nothing new, but these remarks, seen by many as a bald admission of his disregard for consent, may drive those numbers lower. In March, The Christian Science Monitor’s Peter Grier reported on the candidate’s struggles to attract women to his campaign:

The Donald’s image among women in general, and Republican women in particular, is historically bad and getting worse. The GOP is already struggling to attract minority voters. Trump threatens to layer an unprecedented gender gap onto this racial divide.

For instance, in a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 47 percent of Republican female voters agreed that they “could not imagine themselves voting for Trump.” In other words, almost half the women in Trump’s own party don’t like him. A lot.

Trump has been criticized time and again for the language he uses to describe women, and the numerous comments he has made about the physical appearances of high-profile women with whom he interacts. The 2005 video, however, has thrown Trump’s track record of sexually objectifying women into sharp relief.

The backlash against the video, which was first reported by the Washington Post, was strong from members of both parties. Representatives of both parties have said they expect the scandal to come up during Sunday night’s scheduled debate between Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

A small group of Republicans say that Trump’s comments were so offensive that he should choose to withdraw from the election and let another candidate take up the banner of the Republican party.

Sen. Mike Lee (R) of Utah spoke on a live Facebook video feed about his disgust and impatience with the Republican candidate’s behavior.

And while others have not yet issued the same calls for Trump’s resignation, they say that his behavior is "abhorrent" and that they cannot support him in good faith.

“It is some of the most abhorrent and offensive comments that you can possibly imagine,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R) of Utah told Fox13. “That was an apology for getting caught, that was not an apology for the behavior.”

Some Democrats, too, say that this could spell the end of Trump’s campaign.

“For the good of the country, I hope that my Republican colleagues do not try to circle the wagons around a man who brags about sexually assaulting women," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada. "Never in history has a party nominated someone more unfit to be president."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.