US takes over Puerto Rico's finances: a nudge toward statehood?

Puerto Rico takeover: The US Congress appointed a seven-person board that now runs the island's finances. Political debates over its future status may never be the same.

Alvin Baez/Reuters
A member of a labor union shouts slogans while holding a Puerto Rico flag during a protest in San Juan September 11, 2015. Thousands of public sector workers demonstrated against an austerity plan to help pull Puerto Rico out of a massive debt crisis.

Puerto Rico turned over control of its finances on Friday to a seven-person board appointed by the US federal government, inaugurating a period of historic US control over a territory foundering under the burden of nearly $70 billion in public debt.

The board, created by legislation passed by Congress in June, held its first live-streamed meeting in New York on Friday, electing a president and deciding on which of Puerto Rico’s government agencies and institutions would fall under the board’s fiscal direction. The list is long, including the central government, its biggest university, the energy and sewage authorities, a government development bank, and the public pension system, according to the Associated Press.

Four Republicans and three Democrats make up the board. Only four of them are Puerto Rican, and nearly all have experience as financial executives, with some also serving stints in local government, the judiciary, and academia.

In New York on Friday, pro-independence demonstrators gathered in front of the Alexander Hamilton building in protest of what they described as colonialist policies enacted by a “dictatorship”. And on the island, many saw little reason for optimism.

“If this Board acts the way it looks like it will, what’s waiting for us over the next five years is going to be fiscal austerity and, as such, restrictions that will translate into a continual exhausting of Puerto Rico’s economy,” said economist Francisco Catalá in an interview with Metro PR.

Others pointed to the inability of the island’s government to resolve the problems.

“Independent of whether one can be in favor or against the board, it’s positive,” Elías Gutiérrez, a professor at the University of Puerto Rico’s graduate school of urban planning, told El Nuevo Día. “They’re talking about a dictatorship? But here in past years, we’ve destroyed the middle class, the capital bases have been destroyed, [and] the bondholders have been beaten up, affecting their savings.”

The takeover comes amid an unprecedented wave of migration to the mainland as many Puerto Ricans, who are US citizens, seek to escape an ongoing economic crisis. And with the island’s finances out of its hands, some say the takeover could invigorate the debate over its status as an unincorporated territory.

Politics in Puerto Rico are divided largely along the lines of where parties stand on whether the island should become a US state, remain a commonwealth, or declare its independence. But with unemployment at 12 percent and some convinced that the debt load promises further woes, the popularity of the biggest party in support of the status quo, the Popular Democratic Party, have tanked.

"The party has completely fallen apart," Eduardo Villanueva, a pro-independence political analyst, told the Associated Press in June. Congress’ vote to put in place a federal takeover, he added, "was the final blow to the commonwealth status."

Even before the takeover, some members of the PDP argued that the status quo was no longer feasible. In 2015, University of the District of Columbia professor Rafael Cox Alamar, a one-time candidate for resident commissioner with the PDP, wrote an op-ed in the Hill arguing that “as soon as Puerto Rico hits the applicable fiscal and economic growth benchmarks,” that would return control over its finances back to the island’s government, “it should face a stark choice between sovereignty and annexation.” 

“The status quo must be discarded from the outset because it is both the source of the structural crisis besieging the island and a colonial anachronism at odds with the US’s geopolitical interests in the Americas,” he wrote.

If it comes down to the two, statehood might be likely to win out. In a 2012 nonbinding resolution, 61 percent of voters chose it as an alternative to the status quo.

That plebiscite didn’t include a variety of other non-colonial options, Jorge Benitez, a political scientist at the University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, told CNN in the wake of the vote.

"This isn't to say that support for statehood hasn't increased – it has. But the only thing we can decipher with certainty from the vote is that the people of Puerto Rico want a change to the current status.”

"It isn't clear what change we want, but we want change."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.