The Politics of US series: Guns

First in a 10-part weekly series. The Politics of US looks at polarizing topics to help deepen understanding of the issues – and respect for those with differing views. This installment examines the perceptions surrounding guns, gun violence, and the gun-control debate.

John J. Happel/The Christian Science Monitor
Sporting stores like this one in Manchester, N.H., and elsewhere have started to display leaflets to educate the public about gun safety and firearm suicides.
Follow us on Twitter @CSM_politics
In this week's edition:
  1. Cover story: A gun-rights advocate working to reduce the No. 1 cause of gun violence
  2. By the numbers: Increasing gun sales, but fewer homicides
  3. Civics 101: The Second Amendment
  4. The candidates: Where they stand on gun laws
  5. Interview: World shooting champion Dianna Muller
  6. Engage: Join a Living Room Conversation or visit
  7. Our picks: "A Liberal’s Case for the Second Amendment" – and more  

•   •   •

An unusual alliance to curb gun suicides

By Simon Montlake/Staff writer

Hooksett, N.H. – As the longtime owner of a gun store, Ralph Demicco is passionate about his firearms. At his New Hampshire home, he keeps a collection of rifles, shotguns, pistols, and antique weaponry, including two cast-iron cannons that he stores in the barn beneath an oval wooden wall plaque inscribed with the Second Amendment.

Despite his love of all things with bullets and buckshot, however, Mr. Demicco is also part of a quiet movement that makes him anathema to many of his gun-owning brethren: He is working with mental-health experts and community groups on a campaign to reduce suicides by firearms, which account for the vast majority of gun deaths.

The initiative has now been adopted in various forms in 20 states. Experts believe it will save lives – and is already helping to build mutual respect across one of the most intractable divides in American society. 

Read more

•   •   •


Jacob Turcotte and Story Hinckley

•   •   •

CIVICS 101: The Second Amendment

By Christa Case Bryant/Staff writer

The laws governing gun ownership in the United States stem from the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” 

James Madison, the author of the amendment, had previously written of the “advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation” and criticized European governments for being “afraid to trust the people with arms.” 

The ability to defend oneself and one’s nation against a tyrannical government clearly resonated with at least some of the members of the House of Representatives, who were only six years removed from the American Revolution when in 1789 they took up debate of the proposed amendment (then referred to as the fourth proposition).

According to a record of the proceedings in Congress, a Mr. Gerry stated, “Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins. This was actually done by Great Britain at the commencement of the late revolution. They used every means in their power to prevent the establishment of an effective militia…” 

But an additional provision included by Mr. Madison – “but no person religiously scrupulous shall be compelled to bear arms” – proved unpopular, and was struck from the amendment.

For insight on how this amendment has since been interpreted by the Supreme Court, we recommend the Library of Congress’s briefing.

•   •   •

THE CANDIDATES: Where they stand on gun laws

We encourage you to contact the Monitor on Twitter @csm_politics or by email if you can improve our chart!

Story Hinckley/Staff

Sources: The Johnson-Weld Campaign, the Clinton campaign website, the Trump campaign website,,,, CNN,,,,, and @DrJillStein.

•   •   •

INTERVIEW: NRA World Shooting Champion Dianna Mueller

Meet Dianna Muller. She was a police officer in Tulsa, Okla., for 22 years, and now she is a professional 3-Gun shooter and a member of the National Rifle Association (NRA). In September, Ms. Muller won the NRA's World Shooting Championship in Glengary, West Virginia.

The Monitor's Story Hinckley recently interviewed Muller. Her answers have been edited for clarity and brevity. 

Dave Weaver

Q: What’s the biggest misconception that people have about you – as a gun owner and a member of the NRA?

The biggest misconception is that I, as a gun owner, am somehow the bad guy…. Gun owners are like non-gun owners. We care about others. Our hearts break when we see evil people inflict harm on our kids, citizens, and our country.

I've been to many NRA annual meetings that have hosted 70,000 to 80,000 people under one roof, with hundreds of thousands of guns in the same place and nobody gets shot.  We are good people who respect life and teach our children responsibility for not only firearms, but for life.  

Read more

•   •   •

ENGAGE: Living Room Conversations and

Read more

•   •   •

OUR PICKS: Recommended reading and viewing

1. The state of gun violence in the US, explained in 18 charts (video) VOX

Public mass shootings get all the attention because they’re often so indiscriminate. But the truth is mass shootings are unlike most gun deaths in America…. Most of those killed – 58 people a day – are suicides. 

2. “Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America” by Adam Winkler, constitutional law expert (2011)

Despite what the extremists tell us, gun rights and gun control are not mutually exclusive. We can have both. Indeed, the story of guns in America is one of balancing gun rights with public safety, respecting the right of individuals to have guns and the ability of lawmakers to impose reasonable restrictions on guns to enhance public safety. Over the past forty years, we’ve lost sight of that balanced approach.

3. Library of Congress overview on gun ownership and the Supreme Court

On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller (PDF), the United States Supreme Court issued its first decision since 1939 interpreting the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution…. The outcome of DC v. Heller left some issues unanswered, including whether the Second Amendment restricts state regulation of firearms, and the standard for evaluating the constitutionality of other laws and regulations that impact the Second Amendment right.

4. “The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles,” an adapted lecture by Edward Erler, professor of political science at California State University, San Bernardino. 

… we must be clear – the Second Amendment is not about assault weapons, hunting or sport shooting. It is about something more fundamental. It reaches to the heart of constitutional principles – it reaches to first principles. 

5. “Living with Guns: A Liberal’s Case for the Second Amendment” by Craig Whitney, veteran New York Times reporter (2012)

What we can’t do is remain stalemated. Those on the left can’t continue to hold out hope for a gun-free America that won’t ever come to be, and those on the right can’t blind themselves to the responsibility that must be attached to gun ownership. If we continue to hang on to these illusions, the debate will never end.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The Politics of US series: Guns
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today