How Sanders wants to change the role of superdelegates

Bernie Sanders plans to address primary election anomalies at the Democratic National Convention later this month.

Evan Vucci/AP
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders leaves a meeting hosted by Senate Democrats with Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, July 14,

Bernie Sanders may have conceded the Democratic nomination and endorsed Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, but he is still fighting on at least one front: Superdelegates.

Since it became evident that Senator Sanders did not have enough support to win the Democratic nomination, in either delegates or direct votes, he has been using his party influence to push Mrs. Clinton’s platform to the left, securing her support on a $15 national minimum wage, tougher regulations on fracking, and a public option in Obamacare.

The Vermont senator plans to continue to push his platform at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia later this month, in an attempt to amend the system of superdelegates.

“We have some serious concerns, and I expect some of those concerns may wind up on the floor of the convention,” Sanders told the Washington Post.

Unlike regular delegates who must represent the popular vote, superdelegates are free to support any candidate in the nomination for president. Superdelegates include party leaders, elected officials such as President Obama, and all Democratic senators, representatives, and governors.

While Clinton beat Sanders in acquiring regular delegates throughout the primaries and caucuses 2,205 to 1,846, her biggest advantage was the number of superdelegates who pledged to support her – hundreds even before Sanders joined the race. The Associated Press reports that Clinton has the support of 602 superdelegates, while Sanders currently has 48.

Sanders does not want to do away with superdelegates entirely, according to reports, but he wants to reduce their numbers and their influence over choosing the party’s presidential nominee. He says he'll present proposed rules to a committee on July 25 prior to the convention. If successful, the proposed changes could be debated among all convention delegates.

But some party observers are worried that a debate of this kind is not what the Democratic Party needs right now, as it seeks to unify a divided electorate before November. In fact, unity is the prominent theme of the convention, according to the convention schedule, which includes a speech from Sanders on the first night of the convention. President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, first lady Michelle Obama, and Bill Clinton are also scheduled to speak during the four-day convention. 

Co-chair of the convention rules committee Rep. Barney Frank (D) of Massachusetts told the Washington Post that he expects robust debate over Sanders's proposal when his panel convenes next Saturday.

The changes Sanders will be pushing will not affect his race against Clinton, to the disappointment of many Sanders supporters.

In addition to addressing the influence of superdelegates over the primary election process, Sanders also reportedly wants to press the Democratic party to allow independents as well as Democrats to vote in all state primaries and caucuses, and “encourage and incentivize” states that hold caucuses to expand voting hours so that more people would be able to vote.

“Democrats should be welcoming people into their processes, not keeping them out,” Sanders told the Washington Post.

Sanders tended to do better against Clinton in the caucuses than the primaries. But critics note that more voters participate in primaries than caucuses. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to