Trump's reality TV playbook: Seven ways it changed 2016 election

3. News as entertainment

Television is a storytelling medium, so applying the latest dramaturgical techniques of reality TV to the news was inevitable, says Terence Moran, Professor of Media Ecology at New York University. He’s teaching a senior seminar comparing each of the candidates to a reality show, and says the students “have become interested in the political process, because they are seeing it through a lens they understand, reality programming.”

Professor Moran says his former colleague, the author Neil Postman, foresaw this application of unvarnished entertainment values to everything we consume, even our election of a president. “In his seminal book, ‘Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business,’ Neil had a chapter, ‘Reach Out and Elect Someone,’ predicting everything would eventually be reduced to entertainment, even the most important civic events of our time.”

For decades, actually, election campaigns have been covered as narrative stories (think “horse race” metaphor). But with the industry in an intense competition for eyeballs and profits, Trump has cranked the trend up a notch by assuming the role of an unusually captivating lead horse. As his presence pushed up viewership for Republican debates earlier this year, both Trump and the networks benefitted. CBS president Les Moonves said in a widely quoted comment: "It may not be good for America, but it's ... good for CBS.”

4 of 7

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.