Why Joe Biden is smart to sit out first Democratic debate

Vice President Biden – 'Hamlet on the Potomac' – can see how Hillary Clinton does, and then make a decision: to run or not to run. 

Mike Blake/Reuters
A television commercial promoting Vice President Joe Biden to run in the 2016 democratic presidential race is shown as reporters work in the press room for the democratic debate at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas on Tuesday.

Chances are, Vice President Joe Biden will pay extra-close attention to the Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night.

Mr. Biden is, by all accounts, still actively considering getting into the race, earning the nickname “Hamlet on the Potomac.” And debate host CNN made clear that he was qualified to take part in the debate: He easily crosses the required 1 percent threshold in polls of Democratic voters.

All he had to do was announce his candidacy, and he could be up on stage with Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and the others. CNN even had a podium at the ready, should Biden have had a last-minute urge to fly to Las Vegas and join the fun.

But it’s now too late. Biden has stayed mum and, instead, can watch “fight night” on TV from the comfort of the vice presidential residence here in Washington.

And that, analysts say, is the smart move. Biden can assess the dynamic of the debate and ask himself: Is there an obvious opening for me up there?

“He needs to look and see whether he genuinely believes that Hillary Clinton is the best chance for the Democrats to win,” says Jennifer Lawless, a political scientist at American University in Washington.

“If he thinks her performance is not particularly compelling, or if he thinks that she signals anything to him that suggests she might have a problem in the general election, I think that’s what convinces him to throw his hat in.”

Almost half of the nation’s Democrats (48 percent) want Biden to get into the race, versus 30 percent who want him to stay out, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Monday.

But of those surveyed, only 17 percent said Biden would be their first choice, compared with 46 percent who would back Clinton. Still, that’s with Biden as a noncandidate. Were Biden to get in, the dynamic of the nomination race would change. Voters would see him in full campaign mode, including the energy and enthusiasm he brings to working crowds. At his best, he would blend the authenticity of a Bernie Sanders with the more mainstream Democratic views of a Clinton, coupled with his long experience in government.

In addition, Biden’s record and political career would get a thorough-going review by the media; opposition research by other candidates would also enter the information stream.

At this late stage, many pundits have concluded that Biden won’t get in. The death in May of his elder son, Beau, is still too raw. His family is still hurting.

But Joe Biden has wanted to be president since, well, forever. And the moment of truth is near. If he doesn’t get in before the next Democratic debate, on Nov. 14, then chances are it will really, truly be too late.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.