Why some House conservatives don't want Paul Ryan as the next Speaker

The Freedom Caucus is leading the charge, and they are not fans of Wisc. Rep. Paul Ryan. One Republican House member has a 10- point outline of House Speaker requirements, and it is not clear that Ryan can pass that test.

(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Rep. Paul Ryan, R- Wis., who is set to be elected Speaker of the House on Thursday, arrived for a nomination meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 8, 2015. After two tumultuous weeks that saw current speaker John Boehner announce his resignation and his heir apparent abruptly pull out of the running, House Republicans were in disarray as they confronted a leadership vacuum.

Some conservatives in the Republican party are sharpening their knives to keep Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan from succeeding House Speaker John Boehner, even as they say publicly the election of the next speaker will center on reforms in the US House of Representatives instead of the candidates.

"The focus is on, in my opinion, not who is speaker, but the process changes we can put in place," said Rep Barry Loudermilk (R) of Georgia, a member of the Freedom Caucus made up of the most conservative Republicans in the House.

At least one caucus member has outlined requirements a candidate must meet in order to win an endorsement in the speaker's race, and it is not clear if Ryan can pass the test. In recent days a quiet campaign has started against Wisconsin's Ryan, the former vice-presidential candidate considered the only House member able to gather enough votes to win the election.

For his part, Representative Ryan has repeatedly said he will not enter the race.

A video is circulating around Congress of the floor speech that Ryan gave supporting creation of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the emergency scheme that used public funds to shore up banks during the 2008 financial crisis and that is a bugaboo for many conservatives.

The title of the video on Youtube is "Paul Ryan BEGS Congress to Pass TARP (PATHETIC)."

They have also sent out reminders that Ryan authored the 2010 book "Young Guns" with former Representative Eric Cantor and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, two men considered part of the establishment wing of the party who have seen their political ambitions foiled by more radical conservatives.

McCarthy shocked Washington last week when he withdrew from the speaker election after facing some of the same pressure hard-liners had laid on Boehner, who folded and announced last month he would resign at the end of October.

As the party scrambled to restart its selection process, the rhetoric shifted to focus on the role of the speaker. Last week some conservatives even floated the idea that members could temporarily rotate into the most powerful job in the chamber.

Freedom Caucus member Dave Brat of Virginia has posted to his website "10 Commitments the Next Speaker and House Leaders Should Make."

Most of the commitments would decentralize the House's power structure and give rank-and-file members greater say in granting committee chairmanships, drafting budget legislation, and bringing bills up for a vote. Ryan, though, has a high profile in the current structure, overseeing spending legislation as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.

The list also includes policy areas such as a requirement to oppose "amnesty for illegal immigrants." Right-wing groups frequently attack Ryan as "pro-amnesty."

Representative Brat said the caucus would be happy to interview Ryan if he decides to run.

Still, when asked if he personally supported Ryan, Brat said: "It's not about personal anything, its about rules. If we have regular order, and they want to sign their name to that, I'll support that person."

As The Christian Science Monitor reported, the Freedom Caucus is feeling its oats now

In January, [Rep. John Fleming of Louisiana] and eight other hard-line Republicans formed the House Freedom Caucus to challenge the GOP leadership, which they claim is not fighting hard enough for Republican priorities. Now they’re bigger and they're emboldened. They just succeeded in driving out Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio, who recently stunned Washington with the news that he will retire from Congress on Oct. 30.

In the weeks ahead, the Freedom Caucus will have plentiful opportunities to push the fight further – from the speaker's race to a combustible mix of fiscal deadlines this fall. Though members say they have not yet settled on a strategy, one thing is certain: They are not afraid of government shutdowns, fiscal cliffs, or any other hardline tactics that typically made Boehner wince.

(Additional reporting and writing by Lisa Lambert, editing by David Evans)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why some House conservatives don't want Paul Ryan as the next Speaker
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today