Is Hillary Clinton more liberal than Bernie Sanders on guns?

Representing Vermont, which has a rural hunter constituency, means Bernie Sanders has a 'less liberal' record on gun control. Hillary Clinton is expected to unveil her gun control proposals.

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana
In this Oct. 3, 2015 file photo, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton gestures as she speaks at Human Rights Campaign gathering in Washington. Just days after a deadly shooting in Oregon, Clinton will unveil new gun control measures on Monday, Oct. 5, aimed at strengthening background checks on gun buyers and eliminating legal immunity for sellers. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

In town hall meetings in New Hampshire Monday, Hillary Clinton is calling for tougher gun control laws.

Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign has branded him as the more progressive alternative to the Democratic front-runner Mrs. Clinton. But Mr. Sanders' Achilles heel for some liberals just might be guns.

Representing a rural Vermont constituency with many hunters has left Senator Sanders with a checkered history on gun control. On Friday, National Public Radio's Jessica Taylor wrote “The last thing Bernie Sanders needs right now is a conversation about guns,” crystallizing the problem he now faces.  

Taylor noted that he has “voted to allow guns on Amtrak, against the Brady Bill, and against legislation that would have allowed lawsuits against gun companies. In fact, the [National Rifle Association] even helped Sanders win his first race for Congress.”

The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act was a landmark piece of gun control legislation that federally mandated background checks and waiting periods for firearm purchases. As Politifact reported:

According to Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ reason for opposing the Brady bill was two-fold. First, he believed implementing a national waiting period was federal overreach. And second, he was doing his job.

"He wasn't opposed to states having (waiting periods) if they wanted to. The Republicans wanted to repeal waiting periods in states that had them, and Bernie voted that down," Weaver said. "He said he would be against waiting periods, and he kept his word to the people of Vermont."

As NBC News reported, Mrs. Clinton will announce a plan on Monday that calls for closing the “gun show loophole”, tightening the rules governing Internet sales, and permitting victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers. She has also been highly critical of the NRA’s chokehold on Congress, and said if legislation could not be passed, she would use executive orders to fulfill her agenda.  

If Congress won't act Clinton "will take administrative action to require that any person attempting to sell a significant number of guns be deemed 'in the business' of selling firearms," a Clinton aide told CNN, meaning they will fall under background check laws.

Current law allows weapons to be bought from private "occasional" sellers without background checks.

The Clinton aide said that she will pledge to repeal the 2005 "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act," which prevents victims of firearm violence from suing gun manufacturers and dealers. Clinton will also call for legislation that prohibits all domestic abusers from buying a weapon.

Groups supporting former Maryland governor and Democratic presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley have been targeting Sanders in campaign ads for his record on gun control. Last month, The Christian Science Monitor reported on Mr. O'Malley's  plan to cut the national gun violence death toll in half:

O’Malley’s vocal stance on gun violence is intended to set him apart from his rivals in the election. It is, then, by no means a coincidence that fellow Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders voted in favor of the bill protecting gunmakers from litigation when it passed in Congress.

Sanders has staunchly defended his current views, arguing for a semi-automatic gun ban, instant background checks, and ending the gun show loophole. And he is by no means a gun nut or NRA parrot like some have dubbed him. The group currently grades him at D-, and he peaked at C- in 2006. But whether Sanders has evolved or not, opponents may seize on his record as candidates calling for more gun-safety laws grow louder.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.