Joe Biden: The most popular (undeclared) candidate?

In head-to-head match-ups against Republican rivals, Biden trumps Hillary Clinton, beating each rival by a larger margin.

Kevin Hagen/AP
United States Vice President Joe Biden (c.), flanked by Attorney General Loretta Lynch (l.) and Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge (r.), speaks during the Leaders' Summit on Countering ISIL and Violent Extremism at the United Nations headquarters, Sept. 29.

Joe Biden may not have made a decision for 2016 yet, but he's already the most popular (undeclared) presidential candidate in the race. 

Consider this: Mr. Biden enjoys an 80 percent favorability rating among Democratic voters, higher than any other candidate in the field.

One quarter of Americans who are registered Democrats or lean that way say Biden is now their top choice for president, according to a recent Bloomberg poll. That puts him on the heels of Hillary Clinton, the top choice of 33 percent, and within the poll's margin of error of Bernie Sanders.

In head-to-head match-ups against Republicans, Biden beats each rival by a larger margin than Mrs. Clinton. 

What's more, he's already eligible for the first Democratic presidential debate, scheduled for Oct. 13 in Las Vegas. All he must do to participate is declare his candidacy before the debate starts. 

All this for a man who has not yet declared anything. 

Even as Clinton, the presumed Democratic frontrunner, continues to stumble in the polls thanks to an ill-timed email controversy, the vice president is openly weighing another presidential run. It would be his third shot at the White House since 1988 and a late entry in a race already full of surprises. But Biden and his family are grieving over the death of his son Beau Biden, who died in May, and the vice president has indicated that he will not run unless it is good for the entire family. 

That hasn't stopped the rest of the political world from counting Joe in. 

His favorability ratings have risen as Clinton's have fallen, points out Bloomberg. 

Some 40 percent of Americans have a positive impression of the vice president, while 28 percent have a negative impression, giving him a net rating of +12, compared with +10 for Vermont's Senator Sanders and -8 for Clinton, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

If the 2016 election were held today, Biden would have a better shot at beating a Republican rival than would Clinton, according to the NBC/WSJ poll. 

Voters say they’d back Clinton over Donald Trump by 10 points (49 percent to 39), but the former secretary of State would be statistically tied with Carly Fiorina (45 percent for Ms. Fiorina, compared to 44 percent for Clinton), Ben Carson (46 percent for Dr. Carson, compared to 45 percent for Clinton) and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (44 percent for Mr. Bush, compared to 45 percent for Clinton).

But Biden would do better, the poll finds, besting Bush by eight points (48-40), Fiorina by six points (47-41), Carson by eight points (49-41), and Trump by 19 points (56-35). Sanders would also beat Trump handily (52-36), but the poll did not match Sanders against the other Republican candidates.

A Biden candidacy could be "a real nightmare for the Clinton campaign," said Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster who conducted the survey with Democrat Fred Yang, to The Wall Street Journal. Biden "could pick off votes and put states in play."

In fact, the poll results suggest Biden would siphon support, including minority voters, almost entirely from Clinton, rather than from Sanders. It's enough to scare the Clinton camp – and further encourage Biden supporters. 

What does it say about the Democratic field that a man who hasn't declared anything is already its most popular candidate? 

Perhaps that the base is antsy about backing a presumed frontrunner who is beleaguered by an email controversy that has become a serious liability. And that the next best alternative is a self-described socialist who's still not universally known and who may prove too liberal for many. Or that the remaining candidates poll so low and remain so unfamiliar they barely register in the headlines, the polls, or most voters' consciousness. 

Biden, by contrast, is seen as a breath of fresh air – he is relatively moderate and universally recognized where Sanders is not; open, trusted, and likable where Clinton is not. 

And Biden is on a roll. Viewers loved his much-talked-about interview with Stephen Colbert on CBS's "Late Night," in which the vice president shared his love for his son Beau. It was a moving display of the authenticity and openness for which Biden is known.  

Will it last? 

Political wisdom has it that a candidate is most popular just before declaring. At this point, excitement runs high and coverage is centered around the "will he or won't he" question. No one has examined his record, highlighted his gaffes, attacked his past positions, or challenged his platform. 

In Biden's case, he's got the additional goodwill that came from the outpouring of sympathy after the tragic death of his son, and the additional name recognition that comes from being a well-known and well-liked vice president. 

And if he does declare?

As Republican pollster Bill McInturff told NBC News, "History has shown that the public has a much harsher filter when people become candidates." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.