Why did China compare Hillary Clinton to 'demagogue' Donald Trump?

A Communist Party-run paper that often publishes nationalist editorials accused Mrs. Clinton of attempting to take on the role of the 'rabble rouser' with 'ignominious shenanigans.'

Charlie Neibergall/AP/File
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks during a community forum on healthcare, at Moulton Elementary School in Des Moines, Iowa, Sept. 22. A Chinese government official said Monday, that Hillary Clinton was 'biased' on women’s issues in China, while a newspaper compared the presidential hopeful to Donald Trump for her tweet saying it was 'shameless' for China’s president to preside over a UN conference on gender equality.

Hillary Clinton has caught the ire of some Chinese political commentators after criticizing the country’s president for presiding over a United Nations conference on women’s rights.

Linking to a New York Times article on a recent government crackdown on women’s rights activists in China in a tweet, the Democratic presidential nominee called it “shameless” for Chinese President Xi Jinping to co-chair a UN conference on women’s rights on Sunday. 

In March, Chinese authorities detained five young women in March for organizing what they called "performance art" ahead of International Women’s Day. The women had planned to protest against sexual harassment on public transportation and were ultimately detained for 37 days. A female lawyer who defended one of the activists, Wang Yu, has since been detained, and the five activists were among a group of women’s rights advocated who called on the UN for support and questioned the decision to let President Xi speak at Sunday’s conference.

Mrs. Clinton’s remarks provoked a quick reaction from the Chinese government and media. Li Junhua, an official in China’s foreign ministry, said at a press briefing that the criticism was "groundless," and that "the people in the best position to judge the state of women’s issues in China are Chinese people, particularly Chinese women."

Hong Lei, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, was asked about Clinton’s tweet on Monday.

"Someone in another country is biased on the relevant issue," he responded. "We hope that they will respect China’s judicial sovereignty." 

The Global Times, a Communist Party-run paper that often publishes nationalist editorials, wrote in a Monday editorial that Clinton’s remarks were reminiscent of another high-profile presidential candidate: Republican front runner Donald Trump.

The editorial said that Clinton’s statements were "vulgar, extremely lacking in manners" and worthy of "demagogue Donald Trump."

The English-language version of the editorial was titled: "Is Hillary copying Trump to chase votes?"

"It seems that Hillary, eager to keep a competitive edge in the game, has also resorted to these ignominious shenanigans," the editorial read. "Despite her political acumen ... she is using the language of Trump to cast herself in the role of rabble rouser." 

Clinton isn’t the first senior US official to criticize China’s record on women’s rights. The US Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, highlighted 20 cases of women unjustly detained around the world, including Chinese journalist Gao Yu, who began a seven-year jail sentence in April for providing state secrets to foreigners. 

"We have been saying to the governments holding these prisoners, and others like them: if you want to empower women, don’t imprison them on the basis of their views or beliefs," said Ms. Power in a statement ahead of the conference.

President Obama added in his own statement before the conference: "In too many places – from China to Egypt, from Russia to Venezuela – women have been swept up in repressive crackdowns on civil society, and deprived of their universal rights and fundamental freedoms."

The conference could have been a celebratory moment for China, with it marking the 20th anniversary of the 1995 UN conference on gender equality in Beijing. Clinton, then the US first lady, was a keynote speaker at the conference.

"Human rights are women’s rights and women’s rights are human rights," she said in her speech.

Xi echoed those words during the conference on Sunday, saying: "Women’s rights and interests are basic human rights. They must be protected by laws and regulations."

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did China compare Hillary Clinton to 'demagogue' Donald Trump?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today