Obama a Muslim 'problem'? Trump: 'I'm not morally obligated to defend the president'

When a Trump supporter called President Obama a Muslim, GOP frontrunner Donald Trump said on Saturday he had no moral obligation to correct false assertions.

Robert F. Bukaty/AP
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a town hall event on Thursday in Rochester, N.H.

Donald Trump expressed no regret Saturday over refraining from correcting the man who falsely called President Obama a Muslim earlier this week.

Mr. Trump's inaction has drawn criticism from both Democrats and Republicans, and raised the questions of integrity and whether a presidential candidate has a moral obligation to correct inaccuracies on the campaign trail. Recent history on the subject offers a mixed record. 

Unlike then-Republican presidential nominee John McCain in 2008, Trump did not dispute the allegations of a man in New Hampshire on Thursday, when he stood up at a town hall event and referred to Muslims as “a problem in this country” and accused Obama of being one as well.

“We know our current president is one. You know he's not even an American,” the man said. 

“We have training camps growing where they want to kill us,” he continued. “That's my question. When can we get rid of it?"

“You know, a lot of people are saying that, and a lot of people are saying that bad things are happening out there,” Trump responded. “We're going to be looking at that and plenty of other things.”

“Trump's campaign manager later said that Trump had had trouble hearing in the busy room,” reports The Associated Press. But “the man had been amplified by a microphone and could be heard by reporters seated in the back of the auditorium.”

The Republican frontrunner took to Twitter on Saturday to respond. “Am I morally obligated to defend the president every time somebody says something bad or controversial about him?” he wrote. “I don't think so!”

Obama would not have done the same for him, said Trump. “If someone made a nasty or controversial statement about me to the president, do you really think he would come to my rescue? No chance!”

Trump went on to slam the president for not defending Christians’ religious freedoms, saying, “Christians need support in our country (and around the world), their religious liberty is at stake! Obama has been horrible, I will be great.”

The dispute marks a somewhat ironic twist for Trump, who himself landed GOP nominee Mitt Romney in a similar predicament in 2012 by raising a comparable line of questioning about whether President Obama was born in America. 

Romney declined repeatedly to correct Trump on this issue. “I don't agree with all the people who support me. And my guess is they don't all agree with everything I believe in,” Mr. Romney had then said, according to the AP. “But I need to get 50.1 percent or more.”

Trump’s response is also being compared to Sen. McCain’s, who in 2008 was confronted by a questioner at a campaign event claiming Obama was “an Arab."

“Trump is no John McCain,” wrote The Christian Science Monitor’s Peter Grier Friday. “McCain responded immediately that Obama was ‘a decent family man, [a] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with.’”

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said as much in his daily briefing on Friday, according to CNN.

 “Is anyone really surprised that this happened at a Donald Trump rally?” said Mr. Earnest. “The people who hold these offensive views are part of Mr. Trump's base.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.