Mark Cuban for president? What he sees in Donald Trump.

Billionaire Mark Cuban claims he could beat Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton if he decided to run in the 2016 election. 

(Photo by John Shearer/Invision/AP)
Mark Cuban arrives at the Billboard Music Awards at the MGM Grand Garden Arena on May 18, 2014, in Las Vegas. Cuban says he can beat Donald Trump in a presidential election.

Mark Cuban appears to be inspired by a certain 2016 presidential candidate.

One Donald Trump has the billionaire owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks pondering a presidential run. In an email exchange with CNBC, the business mogul outlined his hypothetical candidacy. Like any good athlete, Mr. Cuban visualizes victory:

“If I ran as a Dem, I know I could beat Hillary Clinton,” Cuban wrote to CNBC. “And if it was me vs. Trump, I would crush him. No doubt about it,” he writes.

[Update: Later on Monday, Cuban told CNBC's Closing Bell: "I'm invested in over 100 small businesses, and I go and talk to school kids. There are so many ways I think I can impact society. I just don't have the temperament, at least not at this point, to be a politician."]

But would a Cuban candidacy offer voters a stark choice? Mr. Cuban and Trump share some striking similarities. Both are billionaires, Mr. Cuban amassed wealth on the sale of Broadcast.com in 1999. Forbes puts Mr. Trump’s worth at $4 billion, and Cuban’s at $3 billion.

Cuban, like Trump, is a reality TV fixture, with a role on ABC's "Shark Tank," a show that also airs on CNBC, in which he leans on his business acumen to critique, and sometimes invest in, startups pitched on the show.

And perhaps most like Trump, Cuban courts controversy: He is a repeat offender, loudly criticizing NBA referees during games of the basketball team he owns, the Dallas Mavericks, often incurring fines from the NBA. Like any worthy potential billionaire candidate, his public profile is established on Twitter, which he has used as a platform to give unsolicited and controversial healthcare advice, and to apologize for making insensitive remarks.

Cuban tells CNBC that what were once liabilities for political candidates are now perceived strengths, like “massive wealth, limited governing experience, even ego-bursting levels of narcissism,” he writes.

Cuban added he'd focus on five top economic problems the country needs to solve if he ran for president. Those include, he said, income inequality, college debt, overly complex taxes, and cybersecurity.

Whether or not Cuban runs, Trump has his attention. The Mavericks owner is expected to be in attendance Monday (taking notes?) as the current Republican front-runner speaks at the Dallas arena where his NBA team plays.

At the moment, a 2016 presidential run by Cuban seems in the realm of pure speculation. But in a campaign season where, so far, being a political outsider seems to be a key factor buoying support for candidates such as Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, and Carly Fiorina, maybe Cuban is on to something. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.