Obama vs. Trump: Who would win on the golf course?

President Obama played golf with former President Bill Clinton Saturday. How would Obama do in a round against Donald Trump?

(AP Photo/Steven Senne)
President Barack Obama, right, and former President Bill Clinton sit in a cart while golfing Saturday, Aug. 15, 2015, at Farm Neck Golf Club, in Oak Bluffs, Mass., on the island of Martha's Vineyard.

After President Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton played golf together on Saturday, the topic of the game as a presidential attribute is making the rounds – and it turns out that GOP candidate Donald Trump's golfing prowess may giving him a political edge.

Out the past 18 presidents, 15 have been duffers. But only a few of those have managed to break 100 in a game where shooting in the 80s is considered respectable.

“Presidents aren’t usually that good as golfers. I’d say maybe [Dwight D.] Eisenhower was a good golfer,” says Ret. Major Harry Linsenbigler, who runs the pro shop at the Fort Benning Golf Course in Georgia and has golfed with top brass. “And maybe [Lyndon B.] Johnson, I knew a guy once got hit by Johnson’s ball. Most presidents are double bogey golfers.”

How good a golfer is Obama? 

According to Golf Digest which published a ranking of presidential golfers in 2009 – compiled with the help of Don Van Natta, an ESPN investigative reporter and author of "First Off the Tee: Presidential Hackers, Duffers and Cheaters from Taft to Bush– John F. Kennedy tops the list with Dwight D. Eisenhower (who had a green outside the Oval Office) running a close second. Mr. Clinton and Mr. Obama (a lefty), ranked seventh and eighth, just ahead of Ronald Reagan. 

No. 7 doesn't sound bad, but this is not exactly an elite group of golfers. “The president’s on vacation for the next 16 days I think and he’ll probably be out there every day and not break a hundred half the time," says Mr. Linsenbigler.

Some, such as Michael Jordan, have publicly bemoaned Obama’s golf game. But Florida resident, Ed Schmidt Jr., a.k.a., The Golf Travel Guru, says in a phone interview: “Regardless of what people think of Mr. Obama politically, him being out there playing on a regular basis does good things for golf.”

“For a couple of years now I’ve just scoured everything to see how Obama plays. There was one quote that said he shot in the mid-90s so now, did he take any Mulligans? Did he take any do-overs? I’ve been in this business over 30 years and seeing his swing I’d say he shoots 95 to 105 would be my guess.”

Still, Obama spends considerable free time on the links. And Mr. Van Natta says, "Obama has taken a lot of criticism but he's really improved since becoming president. He was terrible before he as elected, but he's gotten much better."

Is Obama as good a golfer as Mr. Trump?

Probably not. 

Trump claims to have shot a 66, which would make him as good any professional golfer. 

Trump is an avid golfer, and owns at least 16 golf courses. However, if elected president, Trump would likely break the presidential golfing mold because he reportedly prefers “hole-by-hole” match play to the 18-hole stroke-play traditional to American golf score cards.

“Match play is great if you don’t have the time for 18-holes,” says Mr. Schmidt. “That’s how they play in Scotland. In match play, you can shoot one hole and the guy that makes the hole wins it all. Done. Americans tend to get obsessed with scorecards.”

“Mr. Trump not only owns some high-profile courses, plus he loves the game and it shows,” Schmidt says. “They’re both ends of the [political] spectrum out there playing golf all the time.”

For presidents and captains of industry, golf carries the cache of being an open-air meeting room with bragging rights as well as being a sport. But in this case, what does presidential golfing tell us about the next occupant of the White House?

"In the past 40 years, every time a golfer has gone up against a non-golfer for president the golfer has won," says Mr. Van Natta. "The only exception was Jimmy Carter. In every other case, it holds true that the golfer wins [the election]."

In the 2016 presidential race so far, the only candidate who is considered a "golfer" is Donald Trump.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.