Bobby Jindal wants to downplay his Indian heritage, but Twitter won't let him

The GOP presidential candidate has said many times he wants to be seen as American, not as Indian-American, but the country may not let him.

Gerald Herbert/AP
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal announces his candidacy for President in Kenner, La., on Wednesday. In his speech he said he would rather be seen as American than as Indian-American.

In his speech announcing his bid for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, Bobby Jindal said Wednesday that he was “done” with being seen as Indian-American.

The Louisiana governor called for the end of “hyphenated” identities that point to origin, ethnicity, or wealth. The statement drew cheers from the Kenner, La. audience but has since prompted critics to accuse him of denying his Indian heritage. He is a native-born American, as the Constitution requires, born in Louisiana four months after his parents immigrated from India.

"We are not Indian-Americans, African-Americans, Irish-Americans, rich Americans, or poor Americans. We are all Americans,” Governor Jindal said in his speech.

Using the hashtags #Jindian and #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite, Twitter users, many from India, mocked Jindal’s words and his attempt to distance himself from his Indian heritage. Many found comedy fodder in the fact that while he goes by Bobby – a name he apparently took from the “The Brady Bunch” – his given name is Piyush, and that he converted from Hinduism to Christianity as a teenager.

Others took more critical stances, like pointing out that Jindal appears white in his official portrait, or highlighting the racial ironies of Jindal tweeting, “I’m tanned, rested, and ready for this fight.”

But while the social media universe is just taking note of Jindal’s proclamations now, he has been advocating for a more homogeneous American identity for months, at least.

In January, Jindal gave a speech in London in which he made similar remarks regarding ethnicity.

“My dad and mom told my brother and me that we came to America to be Americans – not Indian-Americans,” he said.

He spoke in favor of the idea of the United States as a “melting pot,” calling for the assimilation of immigrants and the adoption of a single cultural identity.

The notion that “it is unenlightened, discriminatory, and even racist to expect immigrants to endorse and assimilate into the culture in their new country,” he said, “is complete rubbish.”

In April, he said again, ”I'm tired of the hyphenated Americans,” in a speech emphasizing renewed vigor for the “American dream.”

He certainly seems to be trying hard to shed any markers of Indian-ness. For one thing, he has made his conversion from Hinduism to Christianity a centerpiece of his public life. His official announcement video includes him saying, "The single most important moment in my life was the moment I found Jesus Christ – the moment Jesus Christ found me." In a 2009 “60 Minutes” interview, he and his wife said that they do not observe many Indian traditions, though they did have two wedding ceremonies, one Hindu and one Catholic. 

“My mom was fully committed to raising us as Americans,” Jindal told the Washington Post. “That was a conscious decision. We ate food that would be familiar to other families in south Louisiana. She wanted to raise us like other kids in the neighborhood.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Bobby Jindal wants to downplay his Indian heritage, but Twitter won't let him
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today