Obama appoints Ebola czar. Is Ron Klain right for job?

Ron Klain, a seasoned Washington insider, is not a health-care professional. Backers say that his choice shows that the Obama administration understands how difficult it is to get government to work, even in a crisis.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
President Barack Obama asked former White House adviser Ron Klain (shown left in a file photo) to coordinate US efforts to contain the Ebola outbreak, an administration official said Friday after criticism the government's response to the virus has been slow and inadequate.

President Obama on Friday named veteran political operative and bureaucratic manager Ron Klain to coordinate the federal response to the threat of Ebola in the United States.

Mr. Klain served as chief of staff to Vice President Joe Biden from 2009 to 2011. From 1995 to 1999, he held the same job for then-Vice President Al Gore. In 2000, he was lead Democratic counsel for the recount in Florida, which ultimately led to the election of President George W. Bush.

He got his start in politics as a Capitol Hill staff aide and counsel. He served as a campaign official during Bill Clinton’s run for the presidency in 1992.

Currently, Klain is a top executive and general counsel for firms founded by Steve Case, the former chief executive of AOL.

In his new role as the nation’s Ebola czar, Klain will report directly to Homeland Security Adviser Lisa Monaco and National Security Adviser Susan Rice. According to a statement from a White House official, issued on background, Klain’s mission will to be ensure that US efforts to detect, isolate, and treat Ebola patients at home are properly integrated, but don’t detract from the continued fight to stop Ebola at its source in West Africa.

That will be a tall order. But the administration thinks he has a unique set of skills that lend themselves to this emergency job.

“Klain ... comes to the job with strong management credentials, extensive federal government experience overseeing complex operations, and good working relationships with leading members of Congress, as well as senior Obama administration officials, including the President,” says the background White House statement.

Is that what’s needed? The announcement of Klain’s appointment launched an immediate (and predictable) Washington debate as to whether a health-care professional would have been a better choice for the job.

A respected medical figure, such as the late US Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, would have more credibility with the US public and thus do a better job at calming unnecessary fears, in this view.

“Maybe Ron Klain will do a good job, but for perspective, imagine Bush putting Karl Rove in charge of Katrina recovery in October 2006,” tweeted right-leaning RedState editor Dan McLaughlin.

On the other side, Klain supporters said that his choice shows the administration understands how difficult it is to get the various arms of the US government to really work together, even in a crisis. You’ve got to know how various agencies work, and who to call within those agencies, writes Vox editor and publisher Ezra Klein. You’ve got to have the stature to get those agencies to call you back.

“It would have been tempting for the Obama administration to nominate an Ebola czar who sounded good: someone with a long list of medical credentials to her name, or someone with a reassuring public profile. But the federal government has plenty of skilled epidemiologists, and this position needs to do more than the Sunday talk shows,” Klein writes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Obama appoints Ebola czar. Is Ron Klain right for job?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today