Democrats, GOP agree on equal pay for women. Almost.

President Obama and US Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers gave the weekly political addresses Saturday. They both mentioned equal pay for women, but from there the talks split into partisan themes.

Susan Walsh/AP
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., rehearses the Republican response to the State of the Union on Capitol Hill that she delivered Jan. 28, 2014. On Saturday she delivered the weekly Republican address.

There are some political issues that by definition are bipartisan, impossible to argue about without automatically losing votes just by being against the obvious.

Like equal pay for equal work – especially for women, many knowing firsthand the meaning of “glass ceiling” and “77 cents for every dollar.”

In their typically talking-past-each-other radio/Internet addresses Saturday, President Obama and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington State (the senior Republican woman in the US House of Representatives) both talked about equal pay.

No surprise, they’re both for it.

“It’s time to do away with workplace policies that belong in a ‘Mad Men’ episode, and give every woman the opportunity she deserves,” Obama said, referring to the popular TV series that has women in the workplace fighting discrimination through recent decades.

Although Obama can refer to his daughters in this context now and then, for Rep. McMorris Rodgers the issue is, by definition, more personal.

“As a woman who worked at McDonald’s to get through college…. as the mom of two young daughters  … and as the elected representative of thousands of hardworking women, I have always supported equal pay for equal work,” she said. “And if a woman is being paid less than a man because of gender discrimination, that is both wrong and against the law.”

From there, the two quickly split off into partisan directions.

Without using Democrat phrases like “gender gap” or “war on women,” Obama asserted that “On issues that would benefit millions of women, Republicans in Congress have blocked progress at every turn.”

He was speaking of things like raising the minimum wage for all Americans, which he has done by executive order – to $10.10 an hour – for federally-funded workers employed by federal contractors.

“House Republicans won’t vote to raise the minimum wage or extend unemployment insurance for women out of work through no fault of their own,” Obama said in his brief address. “The budget they passed this week would force deep cuts to investments that overwhelmingly benefit women and children – like Medicaid, food stamps, and college grants. And of course, they’re trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act for the fiftieth or so time, which would take away vital benefits and protections from millions of women.”

Republicans have a different view, according to McMorris Rodgers.

“For women across America, it’s not just about equal pay,” she said in her radio address. “It’s about achieving a better life.”
 
 “Unfortunately, the president’s economy is doing exactly the opposite,” she continued. “The unemployment rate for women rose last month – meanwhile, growth is slow and wages are stagnant.”

Her solution: “improve job training and help connect out-of-work Americans with the skills they need … a real all-of-the-above energy policy that helps lower bills on everything from gas to groceries … health care reforms that lower costs and preserve peace of mind in retirement.”
  
 Women are starting two out of three small businesses, “so let’s rein in red tape and start overhauling the tax code to support our innovators and manufacturers,” she said. “And women juggle life, work, and everything in between – so let’s give workers the option of using their overtime toward paid time off if that’s what they’d rather have.”

She didn’t mention it Saturday, but McMorris Rodgers has voted against raising the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 level.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.