Skip to footer

Gay marriage battlegrounds: 7 states to watch

In the states, the battle over gay marriage is gathering steam. Federal judges have preempted local efforts toward legal gay marriage in some states, while activists in other states are gearing up for ballot measures. One state may be moving toward a stronger defense of traditional marriage. Here's the state-by-state rundown.

5. Ohio

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
A protester from Ohio carries a flag outside of the US Supreme Court in Washington, March 26, 2013, the day the justices heard oral arguments in a case concerning California's Proposition 8 ban on gay marriage.

(Updated Dec. 24, 2013) On Dec. 23, a federal judge ruled that death certificates in Ohio must reflect the marital status of the deceased, even though the marriage was same-sex and performed out of state. Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine (R) says he will appeal the decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case involves two gay couples married out of state, in which one of the spouses had died. By being listed as a widow or widower, the surviving spouse has a stronger claim to death benefits. 

The ruling was narrow, but could pave the way for more legal challenges to Ohio's ban on gay marriage. In 2004, Ohio voters approved a constitutional ban on gay marriage with 62 percent of the vote. In April 2013, a survey by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute found that 48 percent of Ohioans supported gay marriage, versus 44 percent who opposed it. In March 2013, a Saperstein Poll conducted for The Columbus Dispatch found that 54 percent backed a state constitutional amendment allowing gay marriage. 

On Dec. 19, the group FreedomOhio announced it had gathered enough signatures to put on the ballot in November 2014 a measure to repeal Ohio's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

5 of 7
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.