Immigration reform: White House says promised push begins next week

Obama met Friday with seven members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus to discuss strategy and policy for the coming debate on immigration reform, a major campaign promise.

President Obama will begin his push for sweeping reform of the nation’s immigration laws – a major campaign promise that was embraced by Latino voters in November – on Tuesday in Las Vegas, the White House announced on Friday.

The announcement that Mr. Obama would pursue legislation that, in the words of the White House, “must include a path to earned citizenship” for the more than 10 million undocumented immigrants in the country, came after a late morning meeting with congressional immigration reform advocates.

The president met with seven members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) – six House members and one senator, Bob Menendez (D) of New Jersey – to discuss strategy and policy for the coming immigration reform debate, according to broad details of the meeting provided by congressional aides and the White House.

“The president is the quarterback and he will direct the team, call the play, and be pivotal if we succeed,” said Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D) of Illinois, the House’s most seasoned immigration reform legislator.

“I am very optimistic based on conversations with Republicans in the House and Senate that we will do more than just talk about the immigration issue this year,” he added. Congressman Gutierrez was the leading Democratic House sponsor of the last drive for comprehensive immigration reform during the George W. Bush administration.

Democrats aren’t the only ones mulling a plan. Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida has offered the broad contours of a conservative immigration reform proposal in recent weeks, albeit one featuring a longer, more difficult path to US citizenship than Democrats or the president are likely to favor.

In the House, Rep. Raul Labrador (R) of Idaho told reporters that he met with colleagues on the House Judiciary Committee this week to discuss immigration reform proposals. Representative Labrador, who worked as an immigration lawyer for more than a decade, does not favor a path to citizenship for most unauthorized immigrants.

A bipartisan group of eight senators is reportedly close to a deal on comprehensive reform measures and could announce a proposal as soon as next Friday, according to several reports.

What could the president’s proposal look like? The legislative principles put forward by the CHC in November are “in line” with what the president wants, according to a release from Representative Gutierrez’s office.

Those include measures to reduce backlogs for immigration of the spouses and children of US citizens; retain high-skilled graduates of American universities in the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields; provide special considerations, including a route to citizenship, for young illegal immigrants known as DREAMers; and a program to provide workers for the nation’s agriculture industry.

The CHC’s proposals also call for providing workplace protections for immigrant workers; “smart and reasonable” border protection; creation of a citizenship verification system in the workplace, and “ensure all workers pay their fair share of taxes, fully integrate into our way of life, and bear the same responsibilities as all Americans.”

While immigration reform was a key Obama campaign promise before his first term, the president failed to make good on that vow during the last four years. Immigrant advocates have frequently criticized the president for his immigration policy during his first term, which saw a record number of deportations and little legislative or political muscle put behind immigration initiatives until the president offered temporary relief for young undocumented immigrants during the heat of the 2012 campaign.

On Friday, the White House noted that immigration reform was "a top legislative priority."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.