A bipartisan surge for Obama's second term? Most Americans doubt it.

On eve of Obama's 'fiscal cliff' meeting with Republicans, a new poll shows that only one-third of Americans say his administration will be able to 'heal political divisions' in the US. That's down from 54 percent in 2008.

Charles Dharapak/AP
President Obama gestures as he answers a question during his press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Wednesday. Mr. Obama maintained to the press that he has lots of 'good relationships' on Capitol Hill, on both sides of the aisle.

Faced with criticism that he doesn’t reach out enough to both political allies and foes, President Obama maintained in his press conference Wednesday that he has lots of “good relationships” on Capitol Hill, on both sides of the aisle, though he promised some “self-reflection” over how he can do better.

Then Mr. Obama also threw out a warning: “There are probably going to be still some very sharp differences,” he said. “And as I said during the campaign, there are going to be times where there are fights. And I think those are fights that need to be had.”

With negotiations set to begin Friday with Republican leaders over how to keep the nation from going over a “fiscal cliff” on Jan. 1 – tax increases plus deep spending cuts – it’s easy to see why Obama would inject that caveat. He is adamant that the wealthiest Americans pay higher taxes and that the remaining 98 percent don’t.  

If Obama is optimistic, he isn’t showing it. But the American people clearly are not. Four years ago, right after a campaign that was all about hope and change, 54 percent of Americans said they thought the Obama administration would be able to “heal political divisions in this country.” Now, that number is 33 percent, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll released Thursday.

Of the 13 goals that Gallup asked about, healing partisanship was seen with the least optimism – and registered the sharpest decline in optimism of all the issues polled. Optimism has risen on bringing home US troops from Afghanistan (now 72 percent, up from 58 percent) and on keeping the US safe from terrorism (now 65 percent, up from 62 percent). But on most issues, including the environment and unemployment, optimism has declined.

“Americans were generally more positive about the potential of the new Obama administration's ability to accomplish most of these goals in November 2008, just after Obama was elected for the first time,” writes Frank Newport, editor in chief of Gallup. “This optimism no doubt reflects in part voters' hopes for any new president and the poor economic conditions that were extant in 2008.”

A new poll from the Pew Research Center also reflects an American electorate than has come down to earth a bit since the heady days after Obama’s first election. Some 56 percent of voters predict Obama will have a successful second term, down from the 67 percent who predicted four years ago that he would have a successful first term.

But Americans are less optimistic about prospects for improving bipartisanship. More than half of voters expect relations between Democrats and Republicans will either stay the same (52 percent) or get worse (14 percent) over the next year.

“Moreover, both Republicans and Democrats send mixed signals about their desire for partisan cooperation,” Pew reports. “About as many Republicans want party leaders to stand up to Obama (50 percent) as to work with him to get things done (46 percent). Democrats are somewhat more amenable to partisan compromise, but 42 percent favor Obama standing up to GOP leaders.”

Maybe the lowered expectations are a good thing for Obama. Just as he says he’s learned a thing or two from his first term, voters, too, have learned that he’s not a miracle-worker.

“I hope and intend to be an even better president in the second term than I was in the first,” Obama said at his press conference.

But he also sounded a note of realism – and indicated he had done a little reading about presidential second terms, which can be marked by missteps and scandal.

“I don't presume that because I won an election, that everybody suddenly agrees with me on everything,” he said. “I'm more than familiar with all the literature about presidential overreach in second terms. We are very cautious about that.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A bipartisan surge for Obama's second term? Most Americans doubt it.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today